Literature DB >> 24337167

Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Shady Nafie1, Raj P Pal, John P Dormer, Masood A Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The possibility of prostate cancer as a cause for steadily rising PSA despite previously negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies is a major concern. An initial negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsy does not necessarily exclude the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. We determined the role of transperineal template prostate biopsy (TPTPB) in prostate cancer detection in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies.
METHODS: Between January 2008 and August 2012, a total of 122 men's records were reviewed after having 36-core TPTPB following two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies despite raised PSA. A retrospective record of PSA levels, clinicopathological parameters and histological outcomes was made.
RESULTS: Mean age was 63 years (range 49-77), and mean PSA was 18.0 (range 2.0-119.0). A total of 71/122 (58 %) men were diagnosed with prostate cancer on TPTPB. Of these, 28 (39 %), 34 (48 %), 5 (7 %), and 4 (6 %) had Gleason score 6, 7 (3 + 4), 7 (4 + 3), and 9 (4 + 5), respectively. The mean number of positive cores was 7 (range 1-22). Of these, only 15 (21 %) had ≤2 cores positive and Gleason score of 6. Of the 51 (42 %) men with a negative histology on TPTPB, 11 (22 %), 10 (19 %), and 30 (59 %) had atypical small acinar proliferation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or benign pathology.
CONCLUSION: TPTPB is associated with a high rate of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis (58 %) in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337167     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1225-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

Review 1.  Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies.

Authors:  T A Stamey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Prostate cancer detection rate and the importance of premalignant lesion in rebiopsy.

Authors:  Damir Aganovic; Alden Prcic; Benjamin Kulovac; Osman Hadziosmanovic
Journal:  Med Arh       Date:  2011

4.  Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy.

Authors:  J Stephen Jones; Amit Patel; Lynn Schoenfield; John C Rabets; Craig D Zippe; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Egevad; L Holmberg; P Sparén; B J Norlén; C Busch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results.

Authors:  Simon R J Bott; Alastair Henderson; James E Halls; Bruce S I Montgomery; Robert Laing; Stephen E M Langley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy using a modified technique: outcome of 270 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Kingsley Ekwueme; Helen Simpson; Hani Zakhour; Nigel J Parr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Neil Fleshner; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identifying prostate cancer and its clinical risk in asymptomatic men using machine learning of high dimensional peripheral blood flow cytometric natural killer cell subset phenotyping data.

Authors:  Simon P Hood; Georgina Cosma; A Graham Pockley; Gemma A Foulds; Catherine Johnson; Stephen Reeder; Stéphanie E McArdle; Masood A Khan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Prostate Cancer: Early Detection and Assessing Clinical Risk Using Deep Machine Learning of High Dimensional Peripheral Blood Flow Cytometric Phenotyping Data.

Authors:  Georgina Cosma; Stéphanie E McArdle; Gemma A Foulds; Simon P Hood; Stephen Reeder; Catherine Johnson; Masood A Khan; A Graham Pockley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Confirmatory biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer in men considering active surveillance: reference centre experience.

Authors:  Cecilia Bosco; Gabriele Cozzi; Janette Kinsella; Roberto Bianchi; Peter Acher; Benjamin Challacombe; Rick Popert; Christian Brown; Gincy George; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Declan Cahill
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-04-14

4.  Identifying the Presence of Prostate Cancer in Individuals with PSA Levels <20 ng ml-1 Using Computational Data Extraction Analysis of High Dimensional Peripheral Blood Flow Cytometric Phenotyping Data.

Authors:  Georgina Cosma; Stéphanie E McArdle; Stephen Reeder; Gemma A Foulds; Simon Hood; Masood Khan; A Graham Pockley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Complementing the active surveillance criteria with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tae Un Kim; Seung Ryong Baek; Won Hoon Song; Jong Kil Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Sung Woo Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-11

Review 6.  Management of low risk prostate cancer-active surveillance and focal therapy.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 66.675

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.