Literature DB >> 10885353

Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study.

K Sonderegger-Iseli1, S Burger, J Muntwyler, F Salomon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in unselected patients who died in hospital in different medical eras have shown no decline of errors in the main diagnosis. We assessed changes in diagnostic accuracy over 20 years.
METHODS: We analysed retrospectively diagnostic errors, with use of necropsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. We randomly selected 300 patients who died at a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Switzerland--100 in each of 1972, 1982, and 1992. We classified discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings as major and minor errors.
FINDINGS: The overall necropsy rate at the hospital stayed at around 90% for the whole period. During the study, the frequency of major discrepancies declined significantly (1972, 30%; 1982, 18%; 1992, 14%; p=0.007). The rate of minor diagnostic errors increased significantly from 23% in 1972 to 46% in 1992 (p<0.001). The increase in overall diagnostic accuracy occurred mainly because of a significant improvement in specificity for cardiovascular diseases (1972, 85%; 1982, 82%; 1992, 97%; p=0.034) and non-significantly improved sensitivity (1972, 69%; 1982, 82%; 1992, 86%; p=0.061). Sensitivity also improved for infectious diseases (1972, 25%; 1982, 67%; 1992, 86%; p=0.036). Sensitivity and specificity for neoplastic diseases were high originally and did not change. The total number of diagnostic procedures per year increased from 191 in 1972 to 259 in 1992, mainly because of non-invasive techniques, such as ultrasonography, and endoscopies.
INTERPRETATION: The frequency of major diagnostic errors in unselected patients who died in hospital was halved over 20 years, probably because of improved clinical skills and new diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10885353     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02349-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  46 in total

Review 1.  Clinical diagnosis and the function of necropsy.

Authors:  J H Baron
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Ultrasound stethoscopy: a renaissance of the physical examination?

Authors:  J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital.

Authors:  M H C Grade; S Zucoloto; J K Kajiwara; M T P Fernandes; L G F Couto; S B Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Echocardiography: frontier imaging in cardiology.

Authors:  R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Reversing the slow death of the clinical necropsy: developing the post of the Pathology Liaison Nurse.

Authors:  Eileen Limacher; Urszula Carr; Lesley Bowker; Richard Y Ball
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; S E Shirley; C T Escoffery; M Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.