OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of brief interventions during the "watchful waiting" period for hypertension. DESIGN: Factorial trial. SETTING: General practice. METHODS:296 patients with blood pressure > 160/90 mm Hg were randomised to eight groups defined by three factors: an information booklet; low sodium, high potassium salt; prompt sheets for high fruit, vegetable, fibre; and low fat. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure (primary outcome); secondary outcomes of diet, weight, and dietary biomarkers (urinary sodium:potassium (Na:K) ratio; carotenoid concentrations). RESULTS:Blood pressure was not affected by the booklet (mean difference (diastolic blood pressure) at one month 0.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.0), salt (0.13; 1.7 to 2.0), or prompts (0.52; 1.3 to 2.4). The salt decreased Na:K ratio (difference 0.32; 0.08 to 0.56, P = 0.01), and the prompts helped control weight (difference 0.39 (0.85 to 0.05) kg at one month, P = 0.085; 1.2 (0.1 to 2.25) kg at six months, P = 0.03). Among those with lower fruit and vegetable consumption (< 300 g per day), prompts increased fruit and vegetable consumption and also carotenoid concentrations (difference 143 (16 to 269) mmol/l, P < 0.03) but did not decrease blood pressure. CONCLUSION: During watchful waiting, over and above the effect of brief advice and monitoring, an information booklet, lifestyle prompts, and low sodium salt do not reduce blood pressure. Secondary analysis suggests that brief interventions-particularly lifestyle prompts-can make useful changes in diet and help control weight, which previous research indicates are likely to reduce the long term risk of stroke.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of brief interventions during the "watchful waiting" period for hypertension. DESIGN: Factorial trial. SETTING: General practice. METHODS: 296 patients with blood pressure > 160/90 mm Hg were randomised to eight groups defined by three factors: an information booklet; low sodium, high potassium salt; prompt sheets for high fruit, vegetable, fibre; and low fat. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure (primary outcome); secondary outcomes of diet, weight, and dietary biomarkers (urinary sodium:potassium (Na:K) ratio; carotenoid concentrations). RESULTS: Blood pressure was not affected by the booklet (mean difference (diastolic blood pressure) at one month 0.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.0), salt (0.13; 1.7 to 2.0), or prompts (0.52; 1.3 to 2.4). The salt decreased Na:K ratio (difference 0.32; 0.08 to 0.56, P = 0.01), and the prompts helped control weight (difference 0.39 (0.85 to 0.05) kg at one month, P = 0.085; 1.2 (0.1 to 2.25) kg at six months, P = 0.03). Among those with lower fruit and vegetable consumption (< 300 g per day), prompts increased fruit and vegetable consumption and also carotenoid concentrations (difference 143 (16 to 269) mmol/l, P < 0.03) but did not decrease blood pressure. CONCLUSION: During watchful waiting, over and above the effect of brief advice and monitoring, an information booklet, lifestyle prompts, and low sodium salt do not reduce blood pressure. Secondary analysis suggests that brief interventions-particularly lifestyle prompts-can make useful changes in diet and help control weight, which previous research indicates are likely to reduce the long term risk of stroke.
Authors: P Little; J Barnett; B Margetts; A L Kinmonth; J Gabbay; R Thompson; D Warm; H Warwick; S Wooton Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: L Ramsay; B Williams; G Johnston; G MacGregor; L Poston; J Potter; N Poulter; G Russell Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: K J Joshipura; A Ascherio; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; E B Rimm; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens; D Spiegelman; W C Willett Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-10-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L J Appel; T J Moore; E Obarzanek; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; T M Vogt; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N Karanja Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen J Moore; George Davey Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-05-16
Authors: Chudley E Werch; Michele J Moore; Hui Bian; Carlo C DiClemente; Steven C Ames; Robert M Weiler; Dennis Thombs; Steven B Pokorny; I-Chan Huang Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2008-09-18
Authors: P Little; M V Moore; S Turner; K Rumsby; G Warner; J A Lowes; H Smith; C Hawke; G Leydon; A Arscott; D Turner; M Mullee Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-02-05
Authors: Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen Moore; George Davey Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-07-06
Authors: Emma Peacock; John Stanley; Philip C Calder; Susan A Jebb; Frank Thies; Chris J Seal; Jayne V Woodside; Tom A B Sanders Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 3.718