Literature DB >> 10883589

Neural network models of categorical perception.

R I Damper1, S R Harnad.   

Abstract

Studies of the categorical perception (CP) of sensory continua have a long and rich history in psychophysics. In 1977, Macmillan, Kaplan, and Creelman introduced the use of signal detection theory to CP studies. Anderson and colleagues simultaneously proposed the first neural model for CP, yet this line of research has been less well explored. In this paper, we assess the ability of neural-network models of CP to predict the psychophysical performance of real observers with speech sounds and artificial/novel stimuli. We show that a variety of neural mechanisms are capable of generating the characteristics of CP. Hence, CP may not be a special model of perception but an emergent property of any sufficiently powerful general learning system.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883589     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  The perception of handshapes in American sign language.

Authors:  Stephanie A Baker; William J Idsardi; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Laura-Ann Petitto
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

2.  Categorical perception of speech by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Keith R Kluender; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Success and failure of new speech category learning in adulthood: consequences of learned Hebbian attractors in topographic maps.

Authors:  Gautam K Vallabha; James L McClelland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.

Authors:  Yakov Kronrod; Emily Coppess; Naomi H Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

5.  The consequences of Zipf's law for syntax and symbolic reference.

Authors:  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho; Oliver Riordan; Béla Bollobás
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Speech perception as categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Modeling the categorical perception of speech sounds: a step toward biological plausibility.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Hannu Tiitinen; Patrick J C May
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.