Literature DB >> 17201457

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Christine E Staatz1, Susan E Tett.   

Abstract

This review aims to provide an extensive overview of the literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplantation and a briefer summary of current pharmacodynamic information. Strategies are suggested for further optimisation of mycophenolate therapy and areas where additional research is warranted are highlighted. Mycophenolate has gained widespread acceptance as the antimetabolite immunosuppressant of choice in organ transplant regimens. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active drug moiety. Currently, two mycophenolate compounds are available, mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated (EC) mycophenolate sodium. MPA is a potent, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), leading to eventual arrest of T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium are essentially completely hydrolysed to MPA by esterases in the gut wall, blood, liver and tissue. Oral bioavailability of MPA, subsequent to mycophenolate mofetil administration, ranges from 80.7% to 94%. EC-mycophenolate sodium has an absolute bioavailability of MPA of approximately 72%. MPA binds 97-99% to serum albumin in patients with normal renal and liver function. It is metabolised in the liver, gastrointestinal tract and kidney by uridine diphosphate gluconosyltransferases (UGTs). 7-O-MPA-glucuronide (MPAG) is the major metabolite of MPA. MPAG is usually present in the plasma at 20- to 100-fold higher concentrations than MPA, but it is not pharmacologically active. At least three minor metabolites are also formed, of which an acyl-glucuronide has pharmacological potency comparable to MPA. MPAG is excreted into the urine via active tubular secretion and into the bile by multi-drug resistance protein 2 (MRP-2). MPAG is de-conjugated back to MPA by gut bacteria and then reabsorbed in the colon. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium display linear pharmacokinetics. Following mycophenolate mofetil administration, MPA maximum concentration usually occurs in 1-2 hours. EC-mycophenolate sodium exhibits a median lag time in absorption of MPA from 0.25 to 1.25 hours. A secondary peak in the concentration-time profile of MPA, due to enterohepatic recirculation, often appears 6-12 hours after dosing. This contributes approximately 40% to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The mean elimination half-life of MPA ranges from 9 to 17 hours. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. Dose-normalised MPA AUC can vary more than 10-fold. Total MPA concentrations should be interpreted with caution in patients with severe renal impairment, liver disease and hypoalbuminaemia. In such individuals, MPA and MPAG plasma protein binding may be altered, changing the fraction of free MPA available. Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of total MPA appears to increase in proportion to the increased free fraction, with a reduction in total MPA AUC. However, there may be little change in the MPA free concentration. Ciclosporin inhibits biliary excretion of MPAG by MRP-2, reducing enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. Exposure to MPA when mycophenolate mofetil is given in combination with ciclosporin is approximately 30-40% lower than when given alone or with tacrolimus or sirolimus. High dosages of corticosteroids may induce expression of UGT, reducing exposure to MPA. Other co-medications can interfere with the absorption, enterohepatic recycling and metabolism of mycophenolate. Most pharmacokinetic investigations of MPA have involved mycophenolate mofetil rather than EC-mycophenolate sodium therapy. In population pharmacokinetic studies, MPA CL/F in adults ranges from 14.1 to 34.9 L/h (ciclosporin co-therapy) and from 11.9 to 25.4 L/h (tacrolimus co-therapy). Patient bodyweight, serum albumin concentration and immunosuppressant co-therapy have a significant influence on CL/F. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA have been obtained in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA AUC is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection. Gastrointestinal adverse events may be dose related. Leukopenia and anaemia have been associated with high MPA AUC, trough concentration and metabolite concentrations in some, but not all, studies. High free MPA exposure has been identified as a risk factor for leukopenia in some investigations. Targeting a total MPA AUC from 0 to 12 hours (AUC12) of 30-60 mg.hr/L is likely to minimise the risk of acute rejection and may reduce toxicity. IMPDH monitoring is in the early experimental stage. Individualisation of mycophenolate therapy should lead to improved patient outcomes. MPA AUC12 appears to be the most useful exposure measure for such individualisation. Limited sampling strategies and Bayesian forecasting are practical means of estimating MPA AUC12 without full concentration-time profiling. Target concentration intervention may be particularly useful in the first few months post-transplant and prior to major changes in anti-rejection therapy. In patients with impaired renal or hepatic function or hypoalbuminaemia, free drug measurement could be valuable in further interpretation of MPA exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17201457     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200746010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  198 in total

1.  Maximum a posteriori bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients at different postgrafting periods.

Authors:  Aurélie Prémaud; Yannick Le Meur; Jean Debord; Jean-Christophe Szelag; Annick Rousseau; Guillaume Hoizey; Olivier Toupance; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in the early period after renal transplantation.

Authors:  B Krumme; K Wollenberg; G Kirste; P Schollmeyer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant children.

Authors:  E Jacqz-Aigrain; E Khan Shaghaghi; V Baudouin; M Popon; D Zhang; A Maisin; C Loirat
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetic monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  L Ghio; M Ferraresso; S M Viganò; F Ginevri; F Perfumo; B Gianoglio; L Murer; G Zacchello; L Dello Strologo; M Cardillo; S Tirelli; U Valente; A Edefonti
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of mycophenolic acid after intravenous administration and oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil to heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Victor William Armstrong; Gero Tenderich; Maria Shipkova; Amin Parsa; Reiner Koerfer; Heike Schröder; Michael Oellerich
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 6.  Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management.

Authors:  M Behrend
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Mycophenolate mofetil reduces the risk of acute rejection less in African-American than in Caucasian kidney recipients.

Authors:  E J Schweitzer; S Yoon; J Fink; A Wiland; L Anderson; P C Kuo; J W Lim; L B Johnson; A C Farney; M R Weir; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Characterizing the role of enterohepatic recycling in the interactions between mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant patients by pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Rik Schoemaker; Eduard Scholten; Jan den Hartigh; Jacqueline König-Quartel; Eric van Kan; Leendert Paul; Johan de Fijter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  An exploratory study on pharmacogenetics of inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase II in peripheral mononuclear cells from liver-transplant recipients.

Authors:  F Vannozzi; F Filipponi; A Di Paolo; R Danesi; L Urbani; G Bocci; G Catalano; P De Simone; F Mosca; M Del Tacca
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  The effect of sevelamer on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A and mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Pieper; Franziska Buhle; Steffen Bauer; Ingrid Mai; Klemens Budde; Dieter Haffner; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Uwe Querfeld
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  122 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and metabolites in patients with glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Wai-Johnn Sam; Melanie S Joy
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 2.  Mycophenolate mofetil: fully utilizing its benefits for GvHD prophylaxis.

Authors:  Kentaro Minagawa; Motohiro Yamamori; Yoshio Katayama; Toshimitsu Matsui
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Genetic Variants Associated With Immunosuppressant Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects in the DeKAF Genomics Genome-wide Association Studies.

Authors:  William S Oetting; Baolin Wu; David P Schladt; Weihua Guan; Jessica van Setten; Brendan J Keating; David Iklé; Rory P Remmel; Casey R Dorr; Roslyn B Mannon; Arthur J Matas; Ajay K Israni; Pamala A Jacobson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Surgical Upper Extremity Infections in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Comparative Analysis With Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations for Hand Surgeons.

Authors:  Aaron B Mull; Ketan Sharma; Jenny L Yu; Kevin Hsueh; Amy M Moore; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 5.  How accurate and precise are limited sampling strategies in estimating exposure to mycophenolic acid in people with autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid: An Update.

Authors:  Tony K L Kiang; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of mycophenolic acid in HCT recipients receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  H Li; D E Mager; B M Sandmaier; D G Maloney; M J Bemer; J S McCune
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid Co-Administered with Tacrolimus in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Yan Rong; Patrick Mayo; Mary H H Ensom; Tony K L Kiang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Olesja Rissling; Petra Glander; Pia Hambach; Marco Mai; Susanne Brakemeier; Daniela Klonower; Fabian Halleck; Eugenia Singer; Eva-Vanessa Schrezenmeier; Michael Dürr; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  The utility of trough mycophenolic acid levels for the management of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Negiin Pourafshar; Ashkan Karimi; Xuerong Wen; Eric Sobel; Shirin Pourafshar; Nikhil Agrawal; Emma Segal; Rajesh Mohandas; Mark S Segal
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.