Literature DB >> 17953459

Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi1, Andreas Oliver Zuckermann, Michael Grimm.   

Abstract

Cardiac transplantation has become an established intervention for end-stage heart disease. Clinical outcomes in older cardiac transplant patients have improved over the last decade and are almost similar to those in younger patients. Nevertheless, morbidity and mortality due to infections, cancer and chronic allograft vasculopathy remain problematic. On the other hand, older transplant patients seem to have lower incidences of acute rejection episodes than younger patients. Conventional immunosuppression with calcineurin-inhibiting drugs, azathioprine and corticosteroids is responsible for a number of adverse effects. Although these adverse effects can also be seen in younger patients, tolerance to these agents seems to decrease with increasing age. In particular, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and chronic renal insufficiency are associated with higher morbidity and mortality in older cardiac transplant patients. As the elderly become an ever-increasing segment of the cardiac transplant population, new and innovative immunosuppressive strategies will have to be developed and applied.Currently, the availability of new immunosuppressive drugs means more individualised immunosuppressive protocols can be used. New antibodies for induction therapy, a choice between ciclosporin and tacrolimus, and the advent of mycophenolate mofetil as well as proliferation signal inhibitors (everolimus, sirolimus) have changed immunosuppressive protocols dramatically. Therefore, a generalised protocol for all patients has been replaced by individualised immunosuppression depending on the patient group. Moreover, protocols can be modified during follow-up depending on the individual patient's requirements and problems. Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia could be influenced by the selection of tacrolimus over ciclosporin, and weaning of corticosteroids might have a positive impact on osteoporosis or diabetes. There is also no clear evidence that tacrolimus is associated with a higher risk for new onset of diabetes. Chronic renal insufficiency can be managed with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression consisting of mycophenolate mofetil and proliferation signal inhibitors. Both everolimus and sirolimus also seem to have a protective effect against the onset of graft vasculopathy and some sorts of cancer after cardiac transplantation. As a general rule, however, older cardiac transplant patients should be treated with lower doses and fewer immunosuppressive drugs to avoid over-immunosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17953459     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200724110-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  156 in total

1.  Immunosenescence: impact in the young as well as the old?

Authors:  G Pawelec
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus vs. cyclosporine with MMF in cardiac transplant patients: 1-year report.

Authors:  J A Kobashigawa; L W Miller; S D Russell; G A Ewald; M J Zucker; L R Goldberg; H J Eisen; K Salm; D Tolzman; J Gao; W Fitzsimmons; R First
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients.

Authors:  T S Mele; P F Halloran
Journal:  Immunopharmacology       Date:  2000-05

4.  24th Bethesda conference: Cardiac transplantation. Task Force 3: Recipient guidelines/prioritization.

Authors:  G H Mudge; S Goldstein; L J Addonizio; A Caplan; D Mancini; T B Levine; M E Ritsch; L W Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  D R Onsager; C C Canver; M S Jahania; D Welter; M Michalski; A M Hoffman; R M Mentzer; R B Love
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 6.  Hepatotoxicity of transplant immunosuppressive agents.

Authors:  K V Kowdley; E B Keeffe
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Heart transplantation in elderly patients.

Authors:  M T Olivari; A Antolick; M P Kaye; S W Jamieson; W S Ring
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Clinical relevance of age-related immune dysfunction.

Authors:  S C Castle
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-14       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  Howard J Eisen; Jon Kobashigawa; Anne Keogh; Robert Bourge; Dale Renlund; Robert Mentzer; Edwin Alderman; Hannah Valantine; Georges Dureau; Donna Mancini; Richard Mamelok; Robert Gordon; Whedy Wang; Mandeep Mehra; Maria Rosa Constanzo; Manfred Hummel; Jay Johnson
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression for late cardiac-transplant recipients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Jan Groetzner; Bruno Meiser; Peter Landwehr; Lucia Buehse; Markus Mueller; Ingo Kaczmarek; Michael Vogeser; Sabine Daebritz; Peter Ueberfuhr; Bruno Reichart
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  NFATs and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Hafiz Mohmmad Abdul; Jennifer L Furman; Michelle A Sama; Diana M Mathis; Christopher M Norris
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 2.  A review of pharmacogenetics of adverse drug reactions in elderly people.

Authors:  Maurizio Cardelli; Francesca Marchegiani; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Mauro Provinciali
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Immunotherapy in elderly transplant recipients: a guide to clinically significant drug interactions.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Delayed transplantation of human neural precursor cells improves outcome from focal cerebral ischemia in aged rats.

Authors:  Kunlin Jin; Xiaoou Mao; Lin Xie; Rose B Greenberg; Botao Peng; Alexander Moore; Maeve B Greenberg; David A Greenberg
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.005

Review 5.  Post-cardiac transplant recipient: Implications for anaesthesia.

Authors:  Minati Choudhury
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.