Literature DB >> 10844865

Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.

D A Johnston1, P C Brennan.   

Abstract

Wide variations in patient dose for the same type of X-ray examination have been evident from various international dose surveys. Reference dose levels provide a framework to reduce this variability and aid in the optimization of radiation protection. The aim of this study was to establish, for the first time, a baseline for national reference dose levels in Ireland for four of the most common X-ray examinations: chest, abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine. Measurements of entrance surface dose using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) for these four X-ray examinations were performed on 10 patients in each of 16 randomly selected hospitals. This represented 42% of Irish hospitals applicable to this study. Results have shown wide variation of mean hospital doses, from a factor of 3 for an anteroposterior lumbar spine to a factor of 23 for the chest X-ray. The difference between maximum and minimum individual patient dose values varied up to a factor of 75. Reasons for these dose variations were complex but, in general, low tube potential, high mAs and low filtration were associated with high-dose hospitals. This study also demonstrated lower reference dose levels of up to 40% when compared with those established by the UK and the Commission of the European Communities for four out of six projections. Only the chest X-ray exhibited a similar reference level to those established elsewhere. This emphasizes the importance of each country establishing its own reference dose levels that are appropriate to their own radiographic techniques and practices in order to optimize patient protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10844865     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Investigation into patient doses for intravenous urography and proposed Irish diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  E M Carroll; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.

Authors:  M Finnerty; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.

Authors:  Tolga İnal; Gökçe Ataç
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Another fractured neck of femur: do we need a lateral X-ray?

Authors:  B Almazedi; C D Smith; D Morgan; G Thomas; G Pereira
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Patient dose levels for seven different radiographic examination types.

Authors:  Mohamed Anwar K Abdelhalim
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Optimisation in general radiography.

Authors:  Cj Martin
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

7.  Investigation of the entrance surface dose and dose to different organs in lumbar spine imaging.

Authors:  S Sina; B Zeinali; M Karimipoorfard; F Lotfalizadeh; M Sadeghi; E Zamani; R Faghihi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  Evaluation of dose-area product of common radiographic examinations towards establishing a preliminary diagnostic reference levels (PDRLs) in Southwestern Nigeria.

Authors:  Nnamdi N Jibiri; Christopher J Olowookere
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Optimization of patient radiation protection in pelvic X-ray examination in Ghana.

Authors:  Eric K Ofori; William K Antwi; Diane N Scutt; Matt Ward
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Radiation dose to patients from X-ray radiographic examinations using computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  Reena Sharma; Sunil Dutt Sharma; Shramika Pawar; Ajay Chaubey; S Kantharia; D A R Babu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.