Literature DB >> 10720662

Stereo correspondence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli.

S J Prince1, R A Eagle.   

Abstract

Previous data [Prince, S.J.D., & Eagle, R.A., (1999). Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1361-1365] have demonstrated that the upper disparity limit for stereopsis (DMax) is considerably smaller in filtered noise stereograms than in isolated Gabor patches of the same spatial frequency. This discrepancy is not currently understood. Here, the solution of the correspondence problem for bandpass stereograms was further examined. On each trial observers were presented with two one-dimensional Gabor stimuli containing disparities of equal magnitude but opposite sign. Subjects were required to indicate which interval contained the crossed disparity stimulus. It was found that matching behaviour changed as a function of Gabor envelope size. As a function of disparity magnitude, performance cycled between mostly correct and mostly incorrect at large envelope sizes but was always correct at small envelope sizes. At intermediate envelope sizes performance was cyclical at small disparities but always correct at large disparities. The critical envelope size at which performance changed from mostly correct to mostly incorrect at 270 degrees phase disparity was used as a measure of the matching performance as other parameters of the Gabor were varied. Both absolute and relative contrast were shown to influence the perceived sign of matches. Critical envelope size was also found to decrease as a function of spatial frequency, but more slowly than a phase-based limit would predict. These data cannot be predicted by current models of stereopsis, and can be used to constrain future models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720662     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00242-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the Macaque.

Authors:  B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The wallpaper illusion explained.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Yury Petrov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Ivana Tošić; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Monocular blur alters the tuning characteristics of stereopsis for spatial frequency and size.

Authors:  Roger W Li; Kayee So; Thomas H Wu; Ashley P Craven; Truyet T Tran; Kevin M Gustafson; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.