Literature DB >> 9405529

Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery.

S G Kujawa1, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

The inner ear can be made less vulnerable to acoustic injury by a "conditioning" treatment involving exposure to a moderate-level acoustic stimulus before the acoustic overexposure. The present study was designed to explore the role of the olivocochlear (OC) system in this "protection." Guinea pigs were divided into a number of groups: some (trauma-only) were exposed to a traumatic noise for 4 h at 109 dB SPL; others (condition/trauma) were conditioned by daily exposure to the same noise at 85 dB SPL before the traumatic exposure. In OC-intact animals, the condition/trauma group showed significantly less permanent threshold shift (PTS) than the trauma-only group as measured via compound action potentials and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Other animals with identical noise-exposure regimens underwent deefferentation surgery before the start of conditioning: the OC bundle (OCB) was cut in the brain stem, either at the midline (cutting the crossed OCB to both ears) or at the sulcus limitans (cutting all OC fibers to 1 side). Lesion success was quantified by measuring OC fascicles to the outer hair cell region in each ear. The results from the surgical groups showed that total loss of the OCB significantly increased the noise-induced PTS, whereas loss of the COCB only did not; that the conditioning exposure in deefferented animals increased, rather than decreased, the PTS from the traumatic exposure; and that animals undergoing sham surgery (brain stem cuts that failed to transect the OCB) appeared protected whether or not they received the conditioning noise exposure. The latter result suggests that conditioning-related protection may arise from a generalized stress response, which can be elicited by noise exposure, brain surgery, or a variety of other means. The former results make an OC role in the conditioning process, per se, difficult to assess, given the large effects of OC activity on general acoustic vulnerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405529     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.6.3095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Variation in inter-animal susceptibility to noise damage is associated with alpha 9 acetylcholine receptor subunit expression level.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Centrifugal pathways protect hearing sensitivity at the cochlea in noisy environments that exacerbate the damage induced by loud sound.

Authors:  R Rajan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Old mice lacking high-affinity nicotine receptors resist acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Haiyan Shen; Zhaoyu Lin; Debin Lei; Josiah Han; Kevin K Ohlemiller; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Efferent synapses return to inner hair cells in the aging cochlea.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Paul A Fuchs; David K Ryugo; Howard W Francis
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.

Authors:  S Plontke; H-P Zenner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12-28

6.  HOXB1 founder mutation in humans recapitulates the phenotype of Hoxb1-/- mice.

Authors:  Bryn D Webb; Sherin Shaaban; Harald Gaspar; Luis F Cunha; Christian R Schubert; Ke Hao; Caroline D Robson; Wai-Man Chan; Caroline Andrews; Sarah MacKinnon; Darren T Oystreck; David G Hunter; Anthony J Iacovelli; Xiaoqian Ye; Anne Camminady; Elizabeth C Engle; Ethylin Wang Jabs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Modulation of hair cell efferents.

Authors:  Eric Wersinger; Paul Albert Fuchs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Overexpression of SK2 channels enhances efferent suppression of cochlear responses without enhancing noise resistance.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Lisan L Parker; Lucy Young; John P Adelman; Jian Zuo; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.