Literature DB >> 1083154

Measurement of intraocular pressure: a study of its reproducibility.

C D Phelps, G K Phelps.   

Abstract

Intraocular pressure was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometers by two independent examiners in 420 eyes. A difference between measurements of at least 3 mm Hg occurred in 30% of the eyes. Some evidence suggests that the differences between pressure measuremens were caused by actual changes of intraocular pressure rather than by instrument inaccuracy of technician error.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1083154     DOI: 10.1007/bf00411443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0065-6100


  4 in total

1.  The Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  R A MOSES
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Repeated applanation tonometry.

Authors:  R A Moses; C H Liu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  A study of the errors of applanation tonometry and tonography on two groups of normal people.

Authors:  V Berry; S M Drance; R L Wiggins; M Schulzer
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 1.882

  4 in total
  21 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Deviations between transpalpebral tonometry using TGDc-01 and Goldmann applanation tonometry depending on the IOP level.

Authors:  Annette Troost; Kathrin Specht; Frank Krummenauer; Sung Hyun Yun; Oliver Schwenn
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Medicinal glaucoma therapy. What can we learn from large randomized clinical trials?].

Authors:  A G M Jünemann; C Huchzermeyer; R Rejdak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Diurnal variations in intraocular pressure.

Authors:  J T Wilensky
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1991

5.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range.

Authors:  S Munkwitz; A Elkarmouty; E M Hoffmann; N Pfeiffer; H Thieme
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  On the precision and reliability of IOP measurements.

Authors:  J M Gilchrist
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Troost; S H Yun; K Specht; F Krummenauer; O Schwenn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Epidemiology of intraocular pressure in a population screened for glaucoma.

Authors:  R David; L Zangwill; D Stone; Y Yassur
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Comparison of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer at different IOP levels.

Authors:  Fereydoun Farrahi; Farideh Sharifipour; Mohammad Malekahmadi; Bahman Cheraghian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.