Literature DB >> 10830389

Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.

M R Leek1, J R Dubno, N He, J B Ahlstrom.   

Abstract

The report in 1993 by Green [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2096-2105 (1993)] describing the application of a new psychophysical method requiring few trials and little time to measure auditory thresholds has generated considerable interest among experimentalists. The procedure uses a single-interval stimulus presentation, requests a yes-no decision by subjects, and implements a maximum-likelihood calculation to determine the next trial stimulus level within an adaptive track, as well as the final threshold estimate. Data are presented here describing separate experiences with this procedure in two laboratories in both detection and discrimination tasks. Issues addressed include comparisons with more traditional psychophysical methods, variability in threshold estimates, experimental time required, and possible minor modifications to improve the basic procedure. Results using this procedure are comparable in terms of variability of estimates to those emerging from more lengthy procedures. However, because it may be difficult for some listeners to maintain a consistent criterion and because attentional lapses may be costly, experimenters must be willing to monitor performance closely and repeat some tracks in cases where excessively high variability is noted. Further, this procedure may not be suitable for tasks for which the form of the psychometric function is not well-established. Modifications allowing a variable slope parameter in the maximum-likelihood evaluations of psychometric functions may be of benefit.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10830389     DOI: 10.1121/1.428653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Movement-related modulation of vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Shawn S Goodman; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities.

Authors:  Robert M Mallery; Osarenoma U Olomu; Rosalie M Uchanski; Valentin A Militchin; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Comparing the Accuracy and Speed of Manual and Tracking Methods of Measuring Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Theresa J Kunnel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Brittany M Wallace; Jacob R Gardner; Noah M Ledbetter; Kilian Q Weinberger; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.