Literature DB >> 12592505

Movement-related modulation of vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Richard D Andreatta1, Steven M Barlow.   

Abstract

By virtue of the direct coupling between circumoral skin and the underlying orofacial musculature, mechanosensation associated with precise orofacial force control may contribute significantly to processes associated with perception, proprioception, and sensorimotor control in this region. The purpose of this study was to assess lower lip (LL) vibratory detection thresholds of adult subjects during the simultaneous performance of a visually guided and continuous lip motor control task. Vibrotactile inputs were delivered to the right LL vermilion at test frequencies of 5, 10, 50, 150, 250, and 300 Hz. The psychophysical detection task was performed simultaneously with the three force control conditions: a null-force baseline condition, an active force control task performed with the right index finger, and an active force control task performed with the lip musculature. For the active tasks, subjects were instructed to use their analog force signal (lip or finger) to continuously perform a visually guided precision force task by tracking a 2 Hz sinusoidally moving target calibrated to a peak-to-peak force load of 0.2 N. Both the analog force signal and the target-tracking signal were displayed in real-time on an oscilloscope. Results showed a statistically significant elevation of LL vibrotactile detection thresholds for test frequencies below 50 Hz during the simultaneous performance of the lip force control task. Disassociating the site of motor control from the location of sensory stimulation (active control task) was effective in normalizing the elevations in LL vibrotactile thresholds, thus demonstrating that the threshold elevation during the lip force task was not solely an artifact of the added attentional load resulting from combining a perceptual task with a motor control requirement. These findings are discussed in relation to published reports of movement-related sensory gating in limb systems and the possible significance that this phenomenon may have for perception and proprioception in the orofacial system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12592505     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1336-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  The effects of heat-induced pain on the detectability, discriminability, and sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  S J Bolanowski; G A Gescheider; A M Fontana; J L Niemiec; J L Tromblay
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Corticobular connexions to the pons and lower brain-stem in man: an anatomical study.

Authors:  H G KUYPERS
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Muscle spindles in nonhuman primate extrinsic auricular muscles.

Authors:  M Lovell; D Sutton; R C Lindeman
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1977-11

4.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face.

Authors:  M Hollins; K A Delemos; A K Goble
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

5.  Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin.

Authors:  B B Edin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Comparison of perioral reflex modulation in the upper and lower lip.

Authors:  S M Barlow; P T Bradford
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-02

7.  Mechanosensory modulation of perioral neuronal groups during active force dynamics.

Authors:  R D Andreatta; S M Barlow; A Biswas; D S Finan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-10

8.  The effect of cooling on the vibrotactile sensitivity of the tongue.

Authors:  B G Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

9.  Vibrotactile threshold is elevated in temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Mark Hollins; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Lori Fillingim; Alan K Goble
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Regulatory role of proprioceptive input in motor control of phasic or maintained voluntary contractions in man.

Authors:  J Sanes; E V Evarts
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983
View more
  6 in total

1.  Low-level static lip force control does not alter vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Jason H Davidow; Amy T Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Jaw movement alters the reaction of human jaw muscles to incisor stimulation.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mechanical frequency and stimulation-site-related differences in vibrotactile detection capacity along the lip vermilion in young adults.

Authors:  R D Andreatta; J H Davidow
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Gating of sensory input at spinal and cortical levels during preparation and execution of voluntary movement.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Seki; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Authors:  Brianna J McGuffin; Julie M Liss; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.