Literature DB >> 11901109

UV irradiation causes the loss of viable mitotic recombinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Fekret Osman1, Irina R Tsaneva, Matthew C Whitby, Claudette L Doe.   

Abstract

Elevated mitotic recombination and cell cycle delays are two of the cellular responses to UV-induced DNA damage. Cell cycle delays in response to DNA damage are mediated via checkpoint proteins. Two distinct DNA damage checkpoints have been characterized in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: an intra-S-phase checkpoint slows replication and a G(2)/M checkpoint stops cells passing from G(2) into mitosis. In this study we have sought to determine whether UV damage-induced mitotic intrachromosomal recombination relies on damage-induced cell cycle delays. The spontaneous and UV-induced recombination phenotypes were determined for checkpoint mutants lacking the intra-S and/or the G(2)/M checkpoint. Spontaneous mitotic recombinants are thought to arise due to endogenous DNA damage and/or intrinsic stalling of replication forks. Cells lacking only the intra-S checkpoint exhibited no UV-induced increase in the frequency of recombinants above spontaneous levels. Mutants lacking the G(2)/M checkpoint exhibited a novel phenotype; following UV irradiation the recombinant frequency fell below the frequency of spontaneous recombinants. This implies that, as well as UV-induced recombinants, spontaneous recombinants are also lost in G(2)/M mutants after UV irradiation. Therefore, as well as lack of time for DNA repair, loss of spontaneous and damage-induced recombinants also contributes to cell death in UV-irradiated G(2)/M checkpoint mutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11901109      PMCID: PMC1462011     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  51 in total

Review 1.  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.

Authors:  S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest.

Authors:  D Lydall; T Weinert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The complete sequence of the coding region of the ATM gene reveals similarity to cell cycle regulators in different species.

Authors:  K Savitsky; S Sfez; D A Tagle; Y Ziv; A Sartiel; F S Collins; Y Shiloh; G Rotman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  The fission yeast rad22 gene, having a function in mating-type switching and repair of DNA damages, encodes a protein homolog to Rad52 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Ostermann; A Lorentz; H Schmidt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases.

Authors:  J E Haber
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast.

Authors:  Z Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Differential expression of the rhp51+ gene, a recA and RAD51 homolog from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Y K Jang; Y H Jin; K Myung; R H Seong; S H Hong; S D Park
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-02-22       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast.

Authors:  J B Allen; Z Zhou; W Siede; E C Friedberg; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  p53 is linked directly to homologous recombination processes via RAD51/RecA protein interaction.

Authors:  H W Stürzbecher; B Donzelmann; W Henning; U Knippschild; S Buchhop
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Isolation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RAD54 homologue, rhp54+, a gene involved in the repair of radiation damage and replication fidelity.

Authors:  D F Muris; K Vreeken; A M Carr; J M Murray; C Smit; P H Lohman; A Pastink
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fission yeast Hsk1 (Cdc7) kinase is required after replication initiation for induced mutagenesis and proper response to DNA alkylation damage.

Authors:  William P Dolan; Anh-Huy Le; Henning Schmidt; Ji-Ping Yuan; Marc Green; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The severe slow growth of Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is suppressed by loss of recombination and checkpoint genes.

Authors:  Mohamed Maftahi; Justin C Hope; Lissette Delgado-Cruzata; Christine S Han; Greg A Freyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Pathway utilization in response to a site-specific DNA double-strand break in fission yeast.

Authors:  John Prudden; Joanne S Evans; Sharon P Hussey; Bryan Deans; Peter O'Neill; John Thacker; Tim Humphrey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome controls repair and recombination by ubiquitylating Rhp54 in fission yeast.

Authors:  Michelle Trickey; Margaret Grimaldi; Hiroyuki Yamano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Role of Blm and collaborating factors in recombination and survival following replication stress in Ustilago maydis.

Authors:  Ninghui Mao; Milorad Kojic; William K Holloman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-04-05

Review 6.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe Assays to Study Mitotic Recombination Outcomes.

Authors:  Hannah M Hylton; Bailey E Lucas; Ruben C Petreaca
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  The RecQ DNA helicase Rqh1 constrains Exonuclease 1-dependent recombination at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Fekret Osman; Jong Sook Ahn; Alexander Lorenz; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.