Literature DB >> 10804044

Ebastine: an update of its use in allergic disorders.

M Hurst1, C M Spencer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Ebastine is a second-generation antihistamine which undergoes transformation to its active metabolite, carebastine. Its antihistaminic and antiallergic effects have been demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo studies, in addition to data obtained from clinical trials. Patients with allergic rhinitis or chronic idiopathic urticaria experienced significant improvement in their symptoms with ebastine 10 or 20 mg once daily. Some studies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) have indicated trends towards greater efficacy with the 20 mg than the 10 mg dose, although only 1 study has shown statistically significant benefits. In comparative trials in patients with SAR, ebastine 10 mg was as effective as most other second-generation antihistamines, including astemizole, azelastine, cetirizine, loratadine and terfenadine. Ebastine 20 mg/day was significantly superior to loratadine 10 mg/day in patients with SAR according to effects on secondary efficacy variables in comparative studies; 1 study found significantly greater changes from baseline in mean total symptom score with ebastine 20 mg (-43 vs -36% with loratadine, p = 0.045). In patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, ebastine 10 or 20 mg daily was significantly more effective than loratadine in reducing total symptom scores from baseline 1 comparative study. There have been no reports of serious adverse cardiac effects during ebastine therapy. Increases in corrected QT interval have been observed during clinical trials; however, these have not been considered clinically significant and were generally of similar magnitude to those seen with loratadine. The normal diurnal variation in QTc interval and the problems associated in correcting for changes in heart rate also complicate assessment of this issue. The incidence of adverse events during ebastine treatment is not significantly greater than that observed with placebo or other second-generation antihistamines.
CONCLUSIONS: Ebastine 10 mg daily is a well tolerated and effective treatment for allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. At this dosage, it is as effective as the other second-generation antihistamines against which it has been compared. Ebastine 20 mg has similar tolerability to the 10 mg dose, and trends towards greater efficacy with the higher dose have been shown in some studies. Ebastine does not appear to be associated with any significant cardiac adverse events. Ebastine is a useful treatment option for patients with allergic rhinitis or chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10804044     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200059040-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  64 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effect of ebastine in young versus elderly healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Y Huang; D Argenti; J Wilson; J Garcia; D Heald
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  Therapeutic advantages of third generation antihistamines.

Authors:  D A Handley; A Magnetti; A J Higgins
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 3.  Appraisal of the validity of histamine-induced wheal and flare to predict the clinical efficacy of antihistamines.

Authors:  E W Monroe; A F Daly; R F Shalhoub
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Comparative effects of nonsedating histamine H1 receptor antagonists, ebastine and terfenadine, on human Kv1.5 channels.

Authors:  C Valenzuela; E Delpón; L Franqueza; P Gay; J Vicente; J Tamargo
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 5.  Treating allergic rhinitis with second-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  C H Nightingale
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Histamine--a major role in allergy?

Authors:  C Bachert
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of the antihistamine ebastine with ethanol in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M J Mattila; T Kuitunen; Y Plétan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Inhibition of neuronal dopamine uptake by some antiallergic drugs.

Authors:  K Matsunaga; T Sato; H Shuto; Y Tsuruta; K Suemaru; Y Gomita; R Oishi
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 10.  Rhinitis and sinusitis: office management.

Authors:  J C Guarderas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  12 in total

1.  [New generation antihistamines as monotherapy or in combination. What is the relevance for daily clinical routine for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis].

Authors:  R Mösges; J Köberlein
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effects of supratherapeutic doses of ebastine and terfenadine on the QT interval.

Authors:  M S Gillen; B Miller; P Chaikin; J Morganroth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ebastine 20 mg, Ebastine 10 mg and Levocetirizine 5 mg in Acute Urticaria.

Authors:  Vippan Goyal; Anu Gupta; Onam Gupta; Dhruvendra Lal; Manharan Gill
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  A comparison of ebastine 10 mg fast-dissolving tablet with oral desloratadine and placebo in inhibiting the cutaneous reaction to histamine in healthy adults.

Authors:  Rosa M Antonijoan; Consuelo García-Gea; Montserrat Puntes; Marta Valle; Ramon Esbri; Josep Fortea; Manuel J Barbanoj
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  [New therapeutic strategies for the different subtypes of urticaria].

Authors:  U Raap; T Liekenbröcker; D Wieczorek; A Kapp; B Wedi
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of ebastine in healthy subjects and patients with renal impairment.

Authors:  Robert J Noveck; Richard A Preston; Suzanne K Swan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of ebastine in patients with impaired hepatic function compared with healthy volunteers: a phase I open-label study.

Authors:  Kenneth C Lasseter; Stacy C Dilzer; Ramon Vargas; Scott Waldman; Robert J Noveck
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Safety of antihistamines in children.

Authors:  A P Ten Eick; J L Blumer; M D Reed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.228

9.  Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  S Rico; Rm Antonijoan; Mj Barbanoj
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-08-31

10.  Ebastine in chronic spontaneous urticaria in higher doses.

Authors:  Kiran V Godse
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.