Literature DB >> 10384858

Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

F E Simons1, K J Simons.   

Abstract

The recently introduced H1 receptor antagonists ebastine, fexofenadine and mizolastine, and the relatively new H1 antagonists acrivastine, astemizole, azelastine, cetirizine, levocabastine and loratadine, are diverse in terms of chemical structure and clinical pharmacology, although they have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with allergic disorders. Acrivastine is characterised by a short terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) [1.7 hours] and an 8-hour duration of action. Astemizole and its metabolites, in contrast, have relatively long terminal t1/2 beta values; astemizole has a duration of action of at least 24 hours and is characterised by a long-lasting residual action after a short course of treatment. Azelastine, which has a half-life of approximately 22 hours, is primarily administered intranasally although an oral dosage formulation is used in some countries. Cetirizine is eliminated largely unchanged in the urine, has a terminal t1/2 beta of approximately 7 hours and a duration of action of at least 24 hours. Ebastine is extensively and rapidly metabolised to its active metabolite; carebastine, has a half-life of approximately 15 hours and duration of action of at least 24 hours. Fexofenadine, eliminated largely unchanged in the faeces and urine, has a terminal t1/2 beta of approximately 14 hours and duration of action of 24 hours, making it suitable for once or twice daily administration. Levocabastine has a terminal t1/2 beta of 35 to 40 hours regardless of the route of administration, but is only available as a topical application administered intranasally or ophthalmically in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Loratadine is rapidly metabolised to an active metabolite descarboethoxyloratadine and has a 24-hour duration of action. Mizolastine has a terminal t1/2 beta of approximately 13 hours and duration of action of at least 24 hours. Most orally administered new H1 receptor antagonists are well absorbed and appear to be extensively distributed into body tissues; many are highly protein-bound. Most of the new H1 antagonists do not accumulate in tissues during repeated administration and have a residual action of less than 3 days after a short course has been completed. Tachyphylaxis, or loss of peripheral H1 receptor blocking activity during regular daily use, has not been found for any new H1 antagonist. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these new H1 antagonists provides the objective basis for selection of an appropriate dose and dosage interval and the rationale for modification in the dosage regimen that may be needed in special populations, including elderly patients, and those with hepatic dysfunction or renal dysfunction. The studies cited in this review provide the scientific foundation for using the new H1 antagonists with optimal effectiveness and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10384858     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199936050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  132 in total

1.  Histamine blockade after astemizole in children: a single-dose, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  F E Simons; W T Watson; A B Becker; K J Simons
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.377

2.  Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.

Authors:  A Pagliara; B Testa; P A Carrupt; P Jolliet; C Morin; D Morin; S Urien; J P Tillement; J P Rihoux
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Leukotriene cysLT1 (LTD4) receptor antagonism of H1-antihistamines: an in vitro study.

Authors:  M Q Zhang; H Timmerman
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.575

4.  Pharmacokinetics of acrivastine after oral and colonic administration.

Authors:  R Balasubramanian; K B Klein; A W Pittman; S H Liao; J W Findlay; M F Frosolono
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  The inhibitory actions of azelastine hydrochloride on the early and late bronchoconstrictor responses to inhaled allergen in atopic asthma.

Authors:  P Rafferty; W H Ng; G Phillips; J Clough; M K Church; R Aurich; S Ollier; S T Holgate
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Single-dose effect of astemizole on bronchoconstriction induced by histamine in asthmatic subjects.

Authors:  C Benoît; J L Malo; H Ghezzo; A Cartier
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of loratadine.

Authors:  J Hilbert; E Radwanski; R Weglein; V Luc; G Perentesis; S Symchowicz; N Zampaglione
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Lack of effect of mizolastine on the safety and pharmacokinetics of digoxin administered orally in repeated doses to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S Chaufour; F Le Coz; T Denolle; C Dubruc; I Cimarosti; C Deschamps; N Ulliac; B Delhotal-Landes; P Rosenzweig
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 9.  The pharmacokinetic properties of topical levocabastine. A review.

Authors:  J Heykants; A Van Peer; V Van de Velde; E Snoeck; W Meuldermans; R Woestenborghs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Intranasal azelastine. A review of its efficacy in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  W McNeely; L R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  27 in total

1.  Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.

Authors:  A Purohit; M Mélac; G Pauli; N Frossard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Ebastine: an update of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  M Hurst; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Fexofenadine: a review of its use in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Authors:  K Simpson; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Allergic rhinitis in children : diagnosis and management strategies.

Authors:  William E Berger
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Azelastine hydrochloride, a dual-acting anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solution, for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Patricia B Williams; Elizabeth Crandall; John D Sheppard
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-07

7.  Synthesis, structure-affinity relationships, and modeling of AMDA analogs at 5-HT2A and H1 receptors: structural factors contributing to selectivity.

Authors:  Jitesh R Shah; Philip D Mosier; Bryan L Roth; Glen E Kellogg; Richard B Westkaemper
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the antihistaminic (H1) effect of bilastine.

Authors:  Nerea Jauregizar; Leire de la Fuente; Maria Luisa Lucero; Ander Sologuren; Nerea Leal; Mónica Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  [Pruritus in childhood. A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge].

Authors:  E Weisshaar; S Seeliger; T L Diepgen; T A Luger; S Ständer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  Determination of ebastine in pharmaceutical formulations by HPLC.

Authors:  S L Prabu; C Dinesh Kumar; A Shirwaikar; Annie Shirwaikar
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.975

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.