Literature DB >> 14748620

Pharmacokinetics and safety of ebastine in patients with impaired hepatic function compared with healthy volunteers: a phase I open-label study.

Kenneth C Lasseter1, Stacy C Dilzer, Ramon Vargas, Scott Waldman, Robert J Noveck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences between patients with hepatic insufficiency and healthy subjects with regard to the pharmacokinetics, cardiac safety and overall safety of ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine.
DESIGN: Open-label parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: 24 patients with varying degrees of hepatic insufficiency, as categorised by the Child-Pugh classification, and 12 healthy volunteers.
METHODS: Healthy subjects and patients with Child-Pugh class A (n = 8) or B (n = 8) received ebastine 20 mg once daily for 7 days. Patients with Child-Pugh class C (n = 8) [single or repeated dose] received ebastine 10 mg. Plasma concentrations of ebastine and carebastine were determined for 23.5 hours following the initial dose on day 1 and for 96 hours following the dose on day 7 by using a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay with a minimum quantifiable limit of 0.05 microg/L for ebastine and 1.00 microg/L for carebastine. Hepatic function was assessed by blood clearance of indocyanine green 0.5 mg/kg administered intravenously on day 2. Cardiac and overall safety parameters were monitored.
RESULTS: Overall, the pharmacokinetics of ebastine were not modified by hepatic impairment. No correlation between ebastine pharmacokinetics and hepatic function, as expressed by indocyanine green clearance, was observed. Comparison of the effective half-life of ebastine and carebastine between groups did not show relevant differences. Therefore, no apparent accumulation of ebastine occurred, and steady-state concentrations of ebastine and carebastine were predictable from single-dose pharmacokinetics both in healthy subjects and in hepatically impaired patients. Finally, no apparent difference was noted in the safety of ebastine between patients with hepatic insufficiency and healthy subjects as assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs and laboratory parameters.
CONCLUSION: Ebastine can be safely administered to patients with impaired hepatic function, as no clinically important differences can be anticipated from the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of ebastine/carebastine as compared with healthy subjects. Nevertheless, the dosage used in severely impaired patients (10mg daily) was half that used in patients with mild to moderate impairment, and any comedication did not include drugs affecting liver function; in clinical practice, both these factors should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14748620     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443020-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effect of ebastine in young versus elderly healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Y Huang; D Argenti; J Wilson; J Garcia; D Heald
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  Comparative clinical studies with ebastine: efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  X Luria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Ebastine: an update of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  M Hurst; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparison of once-daily ebastine 20 mg, ebastine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The Ebastine Study Group.

Authors:  P H Ratner; J C Lim; G C Georges
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Drug accumulation.

Authors:  J G Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol J New Drugs       Date:  1967 Mar-Apr

6.  Pharmacokinetics of the H1-receptor antagonist ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; T Hashizume; M Matsuda; M Sakashita; T Fujii; Y Sekine; M Nakashima; T Uematsu
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1994-01

Review 7.  A review of the cardiac systemic side-effects of antihistamines: ebastine.

Authors:  A J Moss; P Chaikin; J D Garcia; M Gillen; D J Roberts; J Morganroth
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of ebastine after single and repeated dosing in healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Rohatagi; M Gillen; M Aubeneau; C Jan; B Pandit; B K Jensen; G Rhodes
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 9.  Comparative tolerability of second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  F Horak; U P Stübner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Routine tests of renal function, alcoholism, and nutrition improve the prognostic accuracy of Child-Pugh score in nonbleeding advanced cirrhotics.

Authors:  A Abad-Lacruz; E Cabré; F González-Huix; F Fernández-Bañares; M Esteve; R Planas; J M Llovet; J C Quer; M A Gassull
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and the MDR1 polymorphisms and gender on the urinary excretion of the metabolites of the H-receptor antihistamine ebastine: a pilot study.

Authors:  Guillermo Gervasini; Sonia Vizcaino; Juan Antonio Carrillo; Maria Jesus Caballero; Julio Benitez
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A comparison of ebastine 10 mg fast-dissolving tablet with oral desloratadine and placebo in inhibiting the cutaneous reaction to histamine in healthy adults.

Authors:  Rosa M Antonijoan; Consuelo García-Gea; Montserrat Puntes; Marta Valle; Ramon Esbri; Josep Fortea; Manuel J Barbanoj
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.