Literature DB >> 17563125

A comparison of ebastine 10 mg fast-dissolving tablet with oral desloratadine and placebo in inhibiting the cutaneous reaction to histamine in healthy adults.

Rosa M Antonijoan1, Consuelo García-Gea, Montserrat Puntes, Marta Valle, Ramon Esbri, Josep Fortea, Manuel J Barbanoj.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Ebastine is a long-acting, second-generation selective histamine H(1) receptor antagonist. The pharmacodynamics of a new 10mg fast-dissolving tablet (FDT) oral lyophilisate tablet formulation of ebastine were compared with those of desloratadine and placebo following histamine skin intradermal test challenge. The acceptability of the FDT was also assessed.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover, three-period study in 36 healthy adults. The histamine skin intradermal test (0.05 mL of 100 microg/mL solution) was administered into volunteers' forearms, and wheal area was measured 15 minutes later. Ebastine 10 mg FDT, desloratadine 5mg capsule or placebo were given on days 1-5. On day 1, a skin intradermal test was performed at baseline, then every 20 minutes for 2 hours after administration and at 24 hours. The final skin intradermal test was on day 6, 24 hours after the last drug dose. Subjective symptoms (itching, heat and pain) were assessed on day 1 for 2 hours following the first drug dose. There was a washout period of 7-10 days between treatments. At study end, the acceptability of the new ebastine formulation was evaluated using a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Ebastine 10mg inhibited the wheal response to histamine significantly more than desloratadine 5 mg or placebo 24 hours after 5 days' treatment (mean difference between treatments in wheal area reduction from baseline: 26.7%, p < 0.0001; 46.9%, p < 0.0001, respectively), and after 24 hours on day 1 (mean difference: 16.2%, p = 0.0082; 34.2%, p < 0.0001, respectively). The results with desloratadine were also significantly different from placebo on day 1 and after 5 days, but less than with ebastine after 5 days (difference, desloratadine vs placebo: 20.2%, p = 0.0001). No differences in itching, heat and pain were observed between the treatments. Most participants (70%) preferred the FDT, and all reported that it made adherence easier.
CONCLUSION: Ebastine 10 mg FDT demonstrated significantly superior antihistamine activity compared with desloratadine and placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563125     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  28 in total

1.  A study comparing the inhibitory effects of single and repeated oral doses of ebastine and fexofenadine against histamine-induced skin reactivity.

Authors:  M J Barbanoj; R M Antonijoan; C García-Gea; A Morte; I Gich; J Gispert; E Garcia; R Esbrí; X Luria
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg once daily given with and without food in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Hampel Frank; Michael Gillen; Shashank S Rohatagi; Janet Lim; George George
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Effects of supratherapeutic doses of ebastine and terfenadine on the QT interval.

Authors:  Marek Malik
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Orally fast disintegrating tablets: developments, technologies, taste-masking and clinical studies.

Authors:  Yourong Fu; Shicheng Yang; Seong Hoon Jeong; Susumu Kimura; Kinam Park
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.889

Review 5.  Appraisal of the validity of histamine-induced wheal and flare to predict the clinical efficacy of antihistamines.

Authors:  E W Monroe; A F Daly; R F Shalhoub
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  Ebastine: an update of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  M Hurst; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine, epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24 h in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  J A Grant; L Danielson; J P Rihoux; C DeVos
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 13.146

8.  Skin test reactivity to histamine from infancy to old age.

Authors:  W Skassa-Brociek; J C Manderscheid; F B Michel; J Bousquet
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Effect of skin pigmentation on the response to intradermal histamine.

Authors:  C H Van Niekerk; A E Prinsloo
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol       Date:  1985

10.  Comparison of the effects of desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch in human skin.

Authors:  K J Denham; P Boutsiouki; G F Clough; M K Church
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.575

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Chronic spontaneous urticaria: latest developments in aetiology, diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Christian Vestergaard; Mette Deleuran
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  S Rico; Rm Antonijoan; Mj Barbanoj
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-08-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.