Literature DB >> 30706087

Randomised clinical trial assessing migration of uncemented primary total hip replacement stems, with and without autologous impaction bone grafting.

Michael Rutherford1,2, Riaz J K Khan3,4,5, Daniel P Fick3,4, Samantha Haebich4, Oscar Nivbrant6, Thomas Kozak7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement (THR) are concerning in the elderly due to ectatic femoral canals and cortical thinning resulting in higher incidence of fracture and subsidence in this population. To obviate this concern, the authors developed a technique using autologous impaction bone grafting to achieve a better fitting femoral stem. The aim of this randomised clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of the technique.
METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, a total of 98 consecutive participants (100 primary THR procedures) were inducted into a single-institution, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial assessing, with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the efficacy of autologous impaction bone grafting in uncemented primary THR compared with traditional uncemented primary THR technique. The primary outcome measure was femoral component migration using RSA. Secondary outcomes were post-operative proximal femoral bone density (using DEXA), hip function and quality of life using Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), hip pain and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: There was no difference in femoral component stability (p > 0.5) or calcar resorption between the Graft and No Graft Groups at two years. There was also no difference in OHS, SF-12, pain or satisfaction between the Graft and No Graft Groups at two years (p > 0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous impaction bone grafting in uncemented primary THR has shown its short-term post-operative outcomes to be equivalent to standard uncemented technique, whilst offering a better fit in patients who are between femoral stem sizes. AUSTRALIAN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618000652279.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous impaction bone grafting; Cementless total hip arthroplasty; Dual X-ray absorptiometry; Radiostereometric analysis; THR; Uncemented total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706087     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04290-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; N Saito; H Horiuchi; R Iorio; K Takaoka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis.

Authors:  M Krismer; R Biedermann; B Stöckl; M Fischer; R Bauer; C Haid
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

3.  Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Authors:  G J Hooper; A G Rothwell; M Stringer; C Frampton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-04

4.  Straight tapered titanium stem with alumina bearing in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bo-Hyun Hwang; Woo-Suk Lee; Kwan-Kyu Park; Ick-Hwan Yang; Chang-Dong Han
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Primary collared uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: a safe and reliable treatment option.

Authors:  Gavin Schaller; Jonathon Black; Asaad Asaad; Nick Harper; Stuart Webb; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The influence of implant design on periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented HA-coated hip stems. A two-year follow-up study using DEXA.

Authors:  B C H Van der Wal; A I A Rahmy; B Grimm; G M Blake; I C Heyligers; A J Tonino
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA.

Authors:  P R Aldinger; D Sabo; M Pritsch; M Thomsen; H Mau; V Ewerbeck; S J Breusch
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Female patients with low systemic BMD are prone to bone loss in Gruen zone 7 after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jessica J Alm; Tatu J Mäkinen; Petteri Lankinen; Niko Moritz; Tero Vahlberg; Hannu T Aro
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  No functional benefit of larger femoral heads and alternative bearings at 6 months following primary hip replacement.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; James M Mason; Paul N Baker; Paul J Gregg; David J Deehan; Mike R Reed
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  A decade of Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications: a bibliometric trend analysis from 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Agesilaus W Churchill; Eva Malacova; Simon F Journeaux; Martin Richardson; Ross Crawford; Mark L Vickers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Greater early migration of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an increased risk of osseointegration failure: 5th-year results from a prospective RSA study with 39 patients, a follow-up study.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Stefan Budde; Gabriela V Lewinski; Henning Windhagen; Christof HurSchler; Michael Schwarze
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.