Literature DB >> 10790980

The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning.

R L Gomez1, L Gerken, R W Schvaneveldt.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined the extent to which knowledge of sequential dependencies and/or patterns of repeating elements is used during transfer in artificial grammar learning. According to one view of transfer, learners abstract the grammar's sequential dependencies and then learn a mapping to new vocabulary at test (Dienes, Altmann, & Gao, 1999). Elements that are repeated have no special status on this view, and so a logical prediction is that learners should transfer as well after exposure to a grammar without repetitions as after exposure to a grammar with them. On another view, repetition structure is the very basis of transfer (Brooks & Vokey, 1991; Mathews & Roussel, 1997). Learners were trained on grammars with or without repeating elements to test these competing views. Learners demonstrated considerable knowledge of sequential dependencies in their training vocabulary but did not use such knowledge to transfer to a new vocabulary. Transfer only occurred in the presence of repetition structure, demonstrating this to be the basis of transfer.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790980     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Z Dienes; D Broadbent; D Berry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants.

Authors:  G F Marcus; S Vijayan; S Bandi Rao; P M Vishton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; R L Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone; L Staggs
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

5.  Transfer and Complexity in Artificial Grammar Learning

Authors: 
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Implicit learning: robustness in the face of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  M Abrams; A S Reber
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1988-09

7.  Very long term memory for tacit knowledge.

Authors:  R Allen; A S Reber
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-06

8.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge.

Authors:  R L Gomez; L Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

9.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The information acquired during artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.051

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge.

Authors:  Shaun Helman; Dianne C Berry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

2.  Category induction via distributional analysis: Evidence from a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Ruskin H Hunt; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI.

Authors:  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences.

Authors:  Benjamin Martin Bly; Ricardo E Carrión; Björn Rasch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01

Review 5.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Incidental binding between predictive relations.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Mira Bajaj; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-29

7.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  The neonate brain detects speech structure.

Authors:  Judit Gervain; Francesco Macagno; Silvia Cogoi; Marcela Peña; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys.

Authors:  Jenny Saffran; Marc Hauser; Rebecca Seibel; Joshua Kapfhamer; Fritz Tsao; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.