Literature DB >> 9245469

Transfer and Complexity in Artificial Grammar Learning

.   

Abstract

Implicit and explicit learning are sensitive to various degrees of complexity and abstractness, ranging from knowledge of first-order dependencies and specific surface structure to second-order dependencies and transfer. Three experiments addressed whether implicit learning is sensitive to this entire range of information or whether explicit knowledge becomes an important factor in cases of more complex learning. Experiment 1 used recognition and prediction to assess deliberate access to knowledge of letter patterns in an artificial grammar learning paradigm. Experiment 2 manipulated stimulus presentation and response in a sequence-based grammar learning paradigm. Learning can occur without awareness in cases of lesser complexity (such as learning first-order dependencies). However, more complex learning, such as that involved in learning second-order dependencies or in transfer to stimuli with the same underlying syntax but new surface features is linked to explicit knowledge. In contrast to Experiments 1 and 2 which assessed deliberate access to knowledge of the acquisition stimuli, Experiment 3 assessed deliberate access to knowledge of the transfer stimuli. Knowledge of initial trigrams in the transfer stimuli appears to play an important role in transfer. These findings are evaluated in terms of postulated implicit learning mechanisms.

Year:  1997        PMID: 9245469     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  R L Gomez; L Gerken; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Effects of explicit knowledge of workspace rotation in visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Hanako Ikeda; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences.

Authors:  Benjamin Martin Bly; Ricardo E Carrión; Björn Rasch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01

5.  Translating visual information into action predictions: Statistical learning in action and nonaction contexts.

Authors:  Claire D Monroy; Sarah A Gerson; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

6.  Infant rule learning: advantage language, or advantage speech?

Authors:  Hugh Rabagliati; Ann Senghas; Scott Johnson; Gary F Marcus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  When the "Tabula" is Anything but "Rasa:" What Determines Performance in the Auditory Statistical Learning Task?

Authors:  Amit Elazar; Raquel G Alhama; Louisa Bogaerts; Noam Siegelman; Cristina Baus; Ram Frost
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

8.  Complexity, Training Paradigm Design, and the Contribution of Memory Subsystems to Grammar Learning.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Marc Ettlinger; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.