Literature DB >> 18648593

Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Carmel Mothersill1, Colin Seymour.   

Abstract

This paper reviews our current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the induction of bystander effects by low dose, low-LET ionizing radiation and discusses how they may be related to observed adaptive responses or other protective effects of low dose exposures. Bystander effects appear to be the result of a generalized stress response in tissues or cells. The signals may be produced by all exposed cells, but the response appears to require a quorum in order to be expressed. The major response involving low LET radiation exposure discussed in the existing literature is a death response. This has many characteristics of apoptosis but is p53 independent. While a death response might appear to be adverse, the position is argued in this paper that it is in fact protective and removes damaged cells from the population. Since many cell populations carry damaged cells without being exposed to radiation, so called "background damage", it is possible that low doses exposures cause removal of cells damaged by agents other than the test dose of radiation. This mechanism would lead to the production of "U-shaped" dose response curves. In this scenario, the level of "adaptive" or beneficial response will be related to the background damage carried by the cell population. This model may be important when attempting to predict the consequences of mixed exposures involving radiation and other environmental stressors.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648593      PMCID: PMC2477684          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-111.Mothersill

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  59 in total

1.  The radiation-induced bystander effect for clonogenic survival.

Authors:  S G Sawant; W Zheng; K M Hopkins; G Randers-Pehrson; H B Lieberman; E J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Initiation of apoptosis in cells exposed to medium from the progeny of irradiated cells: a possible mechanism for bystander-induced genomic instability?

Authors:  F M Lyng; C B Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro.

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Bystander effects: intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals.

Authors:  J B Little; E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; H Nagasawa
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 5.  Low-dose radiation effects: experimental hematology and the changing paradigm.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Free radical-initiated and gap junction-mediated bystander effect due to nonuniform distribution of incorporated radioactivity in a three-dimensional tissue culture model.

Authors:  A Bishayee; H Z Hill; D Stein; D V Rao; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Extracellular signaling through the microenvironment: a hypothesis relating carcinogenesis, bystander effects, and genomic instability.

Authors:  M H Barcellos-Hoff; A L Brooks
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Exposure to low-level chemicals and ionizing radiation: reactive oxygen species and cellular pathways.

Authors:  B E Lehnert; R Iyer
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Bystander effect induced by counted high-LET particles in confluent human fibroblasts: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Tomoo Funayama; Seiichi Wada
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  The not-so innocent bystander: the microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer.

Authors:  Anna C Erickson; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.902

View more
  22 in total

1.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Computational modeling of cellular effects post-irradiation with low- and high-let particles and different absorbed doses.

Authors:  Adriana Alexandre S Tavares; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  A reaction-diffusion model for radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Oluwole Olobatuyi; Gerda de Vries; Thomas Hillen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Methyltransferases mediate cell memory of a genotoxic insult.

Authors:  R E Rugo; J T Mutamba; K N Mohan; T Yee; J R Chaillet; J S Greenberger; B P Engelward
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  An evaluation of novel real-time technology as a tool for measurement of radiobiological and radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Premila Paiva; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Bystander effects and compartmental stress response to X-ray irradiation in L929 cells.

Authors:  Mihaela Temelie; Daniela Stroe; Ileana Petcu; Cosmin Mustaciosu; Nicoleta Moisoi; Diana Savu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Ionizing radiation-induced bystander mutagenesis and adaptation: quantitative and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Junqing Zhou; Joseph Baldwin; Kathryn D Held; Kevin M Prise; Robert W Redmond; Howard L Liber
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.