Literature DB >> 10788660

Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action.

A M Haffenden1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

Although pictorial illusions have been used to study perception for a long time, the effects of such displays on the visual control of actions has recently been the matter of some debate. Evidence from a re-analysis of an earlier study is presented that suggests pictorial displays can exert opposite effects on perceptual size judgements and grip scaling, perhaps because the two-dimensional elements surrounding the target for a grasp are treated as potential obstacles. This interpretation was supported by the results of an experiment in which the relative position and distance of two-dimensional elements flanking a target had differential effects on perceptual judgements of size and the scaling of grip aperture.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788660     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  24 in total

1.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; James Danckert; Britt Anderson; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.

Authors:  R Gilster; J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; C D Wiesner; R Ferstl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.