Literature DB >> 16733700

Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?

Denise D J de Grave1, Jeroen B J Smeets, Eli Brenner.   

Abstract

In the Brentano version of the Müller-Lyer illusion one part looks longer and the other looks shorter than it really is. We asked participants to make saccadic eye movements along these parts of the figure and between positions on the figure and a position outside the illusion. By showing that saccades from outside the figure are not influenced by the illusion, we demonstrate that the reason that saccades along the figure are influenced is that the incorrectly judged length is used to plan the amplitude of the saccade. This finding contradicts several current views on the use of visual information for action. We conclude that actions are influenced by visual illusions, but that such influences are only apparent if the action is guided by the attribute that is fooled by the illusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733700     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0536-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; A David Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Gregory J DiGirolamo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of the Brentano illusion on eye and hand movements.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: implications for "center-of-gravity" tendencies.

Authors:  P Y He; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  A Mack; F Heuer; K Villardi; D Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

9.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effect of Kanizsa's compression illusion on reflexive saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Is mislocalization during saccades related to the position of the saccade target within the image or to the gaze position at the end of the saccade?

Authors:  Maria Matziridi; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The reduction of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion saccade amplitude by classic adaptation.

Authors:  Paul C Knox
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2010-11-05

7.  Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

Authors:  D A Wismeijer; R van Ee; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Rapid eye movements to a virtual target are biased by illusory context in the Poggendorff figure.

Authors:  D Melmoth; S Grant; J A Solomon; M J Morgan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A visual illusion that influences perception and action through the dorsal pathway.

Authors:  Cristina de la Malla; Eli Brenner; Edward H F de Haan; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-01-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.