Literature DB >> 10784526

Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed.

K G Alberti.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784526      PMCID: PMC1127570          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.

Authors:  J Tully; N Ninis; R Booy; R Viner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.

Authors:  A L Lux; S W Edwards; J P Osborne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

3.  Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem.

Authors:  R al-Shahi; C P Warlow
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

4.  Local research ethics committees.

Authors:  K G Alberti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09

5.  Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland.

Authors:  K W Ah-See; J MacKenzie; N S Thakker; A G Maran
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1998-10

6.  Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.

Authors:  S Holley; C Foster
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1998 May-Jun

7.  Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of multi-centre researchers in the South Thames region.

Authors:  C Foster; S Holley
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1998 May-Jun
  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. But it should lead to improvements in research governance within the NHS.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-13

2.  Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?

Authors:  R Ashcroft; N Pfeffer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

3.  Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: are they cloaked in too much secrecy?

Authors:  Lorraine E Ferris
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Observational study of 353 applications to London multicentre research ethics committee 1997-2000.

Authors:  Malcolm Boyce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-09

Review 5.  New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.

Authors:  E Cave; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population.

Authors:  Hester J T Ward; Simon N Cousens; Blaire Smith-Bathgate; Margaret Leitch; Dawn Everington; Robert G Will; Peter G Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

Review 7.  Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?

Authors:  Jennifer L Gold; Carolyn S Dewa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?

Authors:  R Dal-Ré; R Ortega; E Morejón
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Applying research ethics guidelines: the view from a sub-saharan research ethics committee.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Amy L Corneli; David B Mahoney; Daniel K Nelson; Charles Mwansambo
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).

Authors:  Brad Hagen; Maeve O'Beirne; Sunil Desai; Michael Stingl; Cathy Anne Pachnowski; Sarah Hayward
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.