Literature DB >> 10633333

Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem.

R al-Shahi1, C P Warlow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current working practices of local research ethics committees (LRECs) in their review of a multicentre study approved by the new multicentre research ethics committee in Scotland.
DESIGN: Observational data collected from correspondence with LRECs.
SUBJECTS: All LRECs within the geographical area of the study in Scotland.
INTERVENTIONS: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Delay from application to calling an LREC meeting, to an initial LREC decision, to final LREC approval, and the number of A4 pages required.
RESULTS: The median delay to review of an application at an LREC meeting was 28 days (range 14-97), the median delay from application to the time of LREC final approval was 39 days (range 21-109) and a total of 5,789 A4 pages (26.9 kg) were required to complete the application process.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent standardisation of ethical review of multicentre research, elimination of unnecessary delay, cost and variation in LREC operating procedures is still necessary.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10633333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  6 in total

1.  Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed.

Authors:  K G Alberti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?

Authors:  Paul Glasziou; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

3.  Differentiating between audit and research. Undue protection of patient confidentiality jeopardises both research and audit.

Authors:  C P Warlow; R Al-Shahi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

4.  Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?

Authors:  Konrad Jamrozik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

5.  Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.

Authors:  J C Lewis; S Tomkins; J R Sampson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments.

Authors:  Rustam Al-Shahi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 18.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.