Literature DB >> 9803097

Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland.

K W Ah-See1, J MacKenzie, N S Thakker, A G Maran.   

Abstract

The handling of research proposals by different ethics committees has been reported as varying widely from one district to another. Multicentre research projects are particularly liable to delay when dealing with several individual committees. We recently performed a nation-wide postal questionnaire study in Scotland on young patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Our experience indicates that despite calls for standardization of the processes involved wide variations still exist between committees. Fifteen out of 19 committees approached had unique application forms, the number of copies of forms and other documentation required ranged from one to 20, and the time to final approval ranged from 39 to 182 days (mean of 90 days). Improved training and a standardized constitution of committee members is required. A uniform national application form and improved co-operation between neighbouring committees is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb        ISSN: 0035-8835


  9 in total

1.  Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed.

Authors:  K G Alberti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: are they cloaked in too much secrecy?

Authors:  Lorraine E Ferris
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?

Authors:  Konrad Jamrozik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

Review 4.  Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?

Authors:  Jennifer L Gold; Carolyn S Dewa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.

Authors:  J C Lewis; S Tomkins; J R Sampson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments.

Authors:  Rustam Al-Shahi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  Informed consent for MRI and fMRI research: analysis of a sample of Canadian consent documents.

Authors:  Nicole Palmour; William Affleck; Emily Bell; Constance Deslauriers; Bruce Pike; Julien Doyon; Eric Racine
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?

Authors:  Edwin R van Teijlingen; Flora Douglas; Nicola Torrance
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the North India.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Mallela; Rachit Walia; Chaitra Devi Tm; Maneesha Das; Shipra Sepolia; Priyank Sethi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.