Literature DB >> 19385794

Applying research ethics guidelines: the view from a sub-saharan research ethics committee.

Gail E Henderson1, Amy L Corneli, David B Mahoney, Daniel K Nelson, Charles Mwansambo.   

Abstract

CONSIDERABLE VARIATION HAS BEEN demonstrated in applying regulations across research ethics committees (RECs) in the U.S., U.K., and European nations. With the rise of international research collaborations, RECs in developing countries apply a variety of international regulations. We conducted a qualitative descriptive pilot study with members of the national REC in Malawi to determine criteria they use to review research, and their views on international collaborations. Qualitative content analysis demonstrated that international guidelines are interpreted in light of local African conditions such that emphasis is placed on examining benefit to the community and ensuring the informed consent process translates concepts in locally-meaningful ways. Members suggest that RECs often must comply with regulations that do not fit local conditions. Recommendations are provided for improving such international collaborations.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19385794      PMCID: PMC3140059          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  29 in total

Review 1.  Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Assessing benefits in clinical research: why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky.

Authors:  Larry R Churchill; Daniel K Nelson; Gail E Henderson; Nancy M P King; Arlene M Davis; Erin Leahey; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

3.  Research and informed consent in Africa--another look.

Authors:  C B IJsselmuiden; R R Faden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Improving informed consent: the medium is not the message.

Authors:  Patricia Agre; Frances A Campbell; Barbara D Goldman; Maria L Boccia; Nancy Kass; Laurence B McCullough; Jon F Merz; Suzanne M Miller; Jim Mintz; Bruce Rapkin; Jeremy Sugarman; James Sorenson; Donna Wirshing
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

5.  Is multicenter collaborative research in clinical genetics dead and, if so, what killed it?

Authors:  Alasdair G W Hunter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry.

Authors:  Eric G Campbell; Joel S Weissman; Christine Vogeli; Brian R Clarridge; Melissa Abraham; Jessica E Marder; Greg Koski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research.

Authors:  N E Kass; J Sugarman; R Faden; M Schoch-Spana
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.

Authors:  Rita McWilliams; Julie Hoover-Fong; Ada Hamosh; Suzanne Beck; Terri Beaty; Garry Cutting
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Adnan Ali Hyder; Ademola Ajuwon; John Appiah-Poku; Nicola Barsdorf; Dya Eldin Elsayed; Mantoa Mokhachane; Bavon Mupenda; Paul Ndebele; Godwin Ndossi; Bornwell Sikateyo; Godfrey Tangwa; Paulina Tindana
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.

Authors:  Joses M Kirigia; Charles Wambebe; Amido Baba-Moussa
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries.

Authors:  Ghiath Alahmad; Mohammad Al-Jumah; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers' Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research.

Authors:  Michael Parker; Patricia Kingori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.