Lutropin alpha, recombinant human luteinizing hormone, for the stimulation of follicular development in profoundly LH-deficient hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women: a review.

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is defined as a medical condition with low or undetectable gonadotropin secretion, associated with a complete arrest of follicular growth and very low estradiol. The main cause can be traced back to an irregular or absent hypothalamic GnRH secretion, whereas only a minority suffers from a pituitary disorder. The choice of treatment to reverse this situation is a pulsatile GnRH application or a direct ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin injections. The goal is to achieve a proper ovarian function in these cases for a short time to allow ovulation and chance of pregnancy. Since the pulsatile GnRH treatment lost its former importance, several gonadotropins are in use to stimulate follicular growth, such as urine-derived human menopausal gonadotropin, highly purified follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or recombinant FSH, all with different success. The introduction of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) and FSH provided an opportunity to investigate the distinct influences of LH and FSH alone and in combination on follicular growth in monofollicular ovulation induction cycles, and additionally on oocyte maturation, fertilization competence of the oocyte and embryo quality in downregulated IVF patients. Whereas FSH was known to be indispensable for normal follicular growth, the role of LH remained questionable. Downregulated IVF patients with this short-term gonadotropin depletion displayed no advance in stimulation success with the use of recombinant LH. Patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism undergoing monofollicular stimulation for ovulation induction showed clearly a specific role and need for both hormones in normal follicular growth. Therefore, a combined stimulation with FSH and LH seems to be the best treatment choice. In the first half of the stimulation cycle the FSH dosage should exceed that of LH by 2:1, with an inverse ratio for the second half.

Introduction

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) is a rare disease, characterized by low or undetectable levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and a chronic estradiol deficiency, due to a complete arrest of follicular growth with subsequent amenorrhea. The low or undetectable gonadotropins portray the common endpoint of different diseases and circumstances. Despite a few cases of pituitary origin such as adenomas or inflammation (hypophysitis), the majority of HH patients suffer from a disturbed hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion.1,2 The irregular GnRH secretion can be traced back to a morphological correlate such as Kallmann’s syndrome, adrenal hypoplasia congenita (in men), GnRH gene mutation or Leptin gene mutation in just 10% of all cases.3,4 The remaining 90% can be subsumed as a functional disturbance of pulsatile GnRH secretion, caused by eating disorders, emotional stress or excessive exercise (long distance runners). In the latter, diagnosis can only be made by exclusion of other abnormalities.5

Regardless of the origin and underlying cause, HH also means profound infertility. Therefore, many attempts had been made to override the arrest of follicular growth and achieve a regular ovulatory function of these ovaries. From pulsatile GnRH application as the most physiological treatment to daily injections of different gonadotropins with different stimulation protocols have all been done to achieve normal follicular growth and chance of pregnancy. HH women with their long lasting gonadotropin depletion represent a very distinct group of patients in reproductive medicine. In this review, we will describe and discuss the influence of LH and FSH on normal follicular growth and the results of different stimulation protocols in the treatment of HH women to achieve monofollicular growth for ovulation induction, with special attention on the effect of LH. Additionally, several studies dealing with IVF patients as a model for HH women will be discussed to prove the influence of LH on oocyte quality, fertilization competence and embryo quality.

GnRH secretory patterns and follicular growth

GnRH, a 10 amino acid peptide, will be produced (mainly) by hypothalamic neurons to stimulate the gonadotropic cells in the pituitary.

The hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis is driven by a neuronal pacemaker, located in the mediobasal hypothalamus, on the bottom of the third ventricle. Approximately 15,000 neurons release GnRH in a pulsatile fashion from the eminentia mediana into the portal vein system.6

GnRH stimulates the production of LH and FSH in the pituitary and the pulsatile release of LH, and in part of FSH,7,8 whereas GnRH pulsatility influences FSH bioactivity more than its secretion.7 Several neurotransmitters such as GABA,9 endogenous opioids,10 neuropeptide Y,11 galanin12 or norepinephrine13 are involved in the regulation of pulsatile GnRH secretion.

Even slight changes in GnRH pulse frequency disturb fundamentally LH and FSH secretion and also their bioactivity.2,14 Normal follicular growth will slow down until a complete arrest of follicular growth. Menstrual irregularities, anovulation or oligomenorrhea are the external signs of this malfunction. In the more severe cases, this will lead to a complete ovarian failure and subsequent lost of menstrual bleeding, a central or hypothalamic amenorrhea.

Despite the irregular GnRH secretory patterns, the pituitary LH- and FSH-producing cells remain fullly sensitive to (external) normal GnRH secretion, at least for a while. This is one concept in the treatment of HH.15–17

Ovarian physiology related to LH and FSH secretion

Maturation of the follicles

Follicular development from the primordial to the preovulatory stage occurs continuously in a random fashion and takes several months from the very early primordial follicles (primary or initial recruitment) until one follicle reaches the preovulatory stage.18 In this way, most of the developing follicles became atretic by apoptosis.

The early stages of follicular growth are independent from FSH. From the primary follicle onward, FSH receptors can be found,19 assuming a FSH dependency from this stage. Ovaries from HH women (Kallmann’s syndrome) showed only a few follicles that had passed the primordial stage.20 Otherwise, as recently shown, follicular growth can still progress further in the absence of FSH until the antral stage.21

Follicular phase characteristics

At the end of the luteal phase, with demise of the corpus luteum, estradiol, progesterone and inhibin A decline. The falling progesterone level compromises the hypothalamic endogenous opioid tone, which will enable the GnRH-producing neurons to enhance their firing rate.7,22,23

The subsequent increase in GnRH pulse frequency enhances pituitary FSH and LH production,7,24 and in face of a diminished inhibin A,25 the FSH level rises sharply to pass the threshold level for the secondary (or cyclic) recruitment of the next follicle cohort.26 Due to the FSH increase, this follicle cohort escapes apoptosis and continues to grow.

At this time LH stimulates follicular theca cells to produce androgens (androstendione). These androgens are required for estrogen synthesis by FSH-driven granulosa cells:27 the concept of the classic two cell–two gonadotropin model.

Additionally, FSH has been found to be necessary for normal androgen production,21 and an androgen-promoted stimulation of granulosa cell aromatase activity in antral follicles has been described,28 an LH arbitrated process.

Throughout the follicular phase and with rising estradiol and inhibin levels the amount of circulating FSH declines continuously, whereas LH levels begin to climb29 and end in the preovulatory LH surge, with resumption of meiosis as the most significant LH function.30

Around the midfollicular stage, the increasing GnRH pulse frequency favors LH secretion. This higher GnRH pulse frequency also increases the bioactivity of secreted LH isoformes and decreases their half-life, resulting in an attenuated LH pulse amplitude in face of a higher LH pulse frequency.14,31 The resulting higher LH action drives the androgen output by the theca cells.32 These enhanced intrafollicular androgen levels acquire an amplified granulosa cell activity to avoid a massive intrafollicular accumulation of androgens, because this high androgenetic milieu promotes follicular atresia.33 Nevertheless, the intrafollicular androgens (at normal level) can improve the follicular development and oocyte quality.34

With the declining FSH, a much higher sensitivity to the remaining FSH will be needed to sustain sufficient granulosa cell activity. Additionally, with the rising estradiol level along the follicular phase, FSH changes its isoform to one of higher bioactivity,35 to compensate partly for the declining amount of FSH secreted.

The dominant follicle

Among the cohort of about 10 recruited follicles, normally only one follicle will arrive at the preovulatory stage with the ability to ovulate. This follicle grows faster and produces more estradiol, which is needed to inhibit the androgenetic driven apoptosis in the follicle,36 and inhibin than the others.18 Within this cohort only the dominant follicle reaches the capability to continue to develop in face of diminishing FSH.37

The leading position of the dominant follicle results from a higher sensitivity to FSH, due to a higher amount of FSH (and LH?) receptors or may be greater influenced by local (intrafollicular) growth factors, as these could act independently from FSH or just augment the FSH responsiveness. 18

Since FSH has been recognized as a conditio sine qua non for normal oocyte development,38 in the past LH was conceded only a minor role in follicle maturation.

According to the two cells–2 gonadotropins model mentioned above, the LH action was restricted to the stimulation of follicular theca cells to produce androgens as a precursor of estradiol. These androgens in turn traverse the follicular basement membrane for aromatization by FSH-driven granulosa cells.27

Each cell type has one specific receptor type and interacts only with LH or FSH.

With the midfollicular stage, when a follicle reaches 10 to 14 mm in diameter, granulosa cells increasingly express LH receptors39,40 until the late follicular phase,41 indicating a role for LH in final follicular development and oocyte maturation.39 The LH receptor gene expression is mediated by FSH42,43 and may be facilitated by estradiol.44

With the inhibin-induced decreasing FSH levels at this time,45 LH seems to sensitize the dominant follicle for the remaining low FSH and allows further growth.39 But in fact LH just takes over some of the action of the vanishing FSH.46

Beside this, the rising LH levels lead also to an arrest of midsized follicles to secure monofollicular development and avoid multiple ovulations.47,48

Intraovarian modulators such as insulin growth factor-(IGF-1), epidermal growth factor and tumor necrosis factor are also involved in the regulation of follicular growth by influencing theca and granulosa cell activity.26

In the past, the sensitizing of the dominant follicle to FSH was attributed to a higher amount of FSH receptors in the dominant follicle to allow more binding of the remaining few FSH molecules than the other less developed follicles. But with the existence of LH receptors on granulosa cells, this theory needs to be revised.

Obviously, from the midfollicular stage, LH partly takes over FSH action on granulosa cells. This could explain why the maturing dominant follicle becomes more independent from FSH.49 Interestingly, LH stimulates steroid genesis in mature granulosa cells, but inhibits further cell proliferation. Both the FSH-driven cell proliferation and the LH-induced inhibition are mediated by IGF-1.50

These results demonstrate an inverse relationship between proliferation and steroid synthesis of granulosa cells as they differentiate.

The rising LH level enhances the androgen biosynthesis by theca cells, and in the face of a declining aromatase activity in the smaller, LH-receptor-free follicles, the high intrafollicular androgenetic milieu in these follicles will promote a follicular atresia.46 Thus, the LH receptor gene expression on granulosa cells is necessary to avoid follicular apoptosis and therefore represents one basic factor in the selection of the dominant follicle.

The expression of LH receptors on maturing granulosa cells in concert with climbing LH levels depict the key factors for the selection of the dominant follicle, to keep this follicle alive in face of diminished FSH33 and to avoid additional follicular growth with subsequent multiple ovulations by an enhanced apoptosis rate in midsized follicles.51

Once the follicular size has reached 14 mm in diameter, LH stimulation without FSH becomes able to continue further follicular growth.42,52

After the FSH-triggered secondary recruitment of the follicle cohort, a critical amount of LH and FSH will be necessary to maintain follicular growth and oocyte maturation.53 Additionally, the ability of the preovulatory follicles to transfer their gonadotropic dependence from FSH to LH seems to be absolutely crucial for follicle selection.54

Both hormones exert very different effects on granulosa cell gene expression55 or the extent of granulosa cell steroido-genesis prior to and after ovulation.56

The picture completely differs in men, where LH acts only on Leydig cells and FSH only on Sertoli cells without any cross action.57

LH pharmacology

LH shares an identical alpha-subunit with other hormones as part of a family of heterodimeric proteohormones (thyroid-stimulating hormone, human chorionic gonadotrophin [HCG], FSH). The hormone unique beta-subunit confers the biological action and the ability to bind to a specific receptor. Both subunits are associated with noncovalent bonds.58,59

Until the end of the previous century, human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) was the only commercially available source of LH activity. This preparation contains LH and FSH, derived from the urine of postmenopausal women. Due to an unstable proportion of LH and a reduced LH bioactivity in comparison to normal cycling women,31,60 HCG was added as a LH substitute to allocate a 1:1 ratio of LH and FSH action,61 which means that HMG preparations contain different amounts of HCG. The LH and HCG beta-subunits are identical in 82% of their amino acid sequence,62 which will allow HCG to act on LH receptors. The HCG beta-subunit genes appear to have evolved from an ancestral LH beta-subunit gene by multiple gene duplication and rearrangements.62

With the introduction of recombinant LH (lutropin alpha) to the market, a preparation with a defined LH activity became available for clinical use.

Luveris® (lutropin-α; Serono SA), under extensive testing since 1993, has been first registered in the European Union in 2001.

The drug is characterized by a consistent isoform profile with a high reproducible reliability.63 The fundamental advantage in the recombinant production of a gonadotropin is the highly and unreached purification, without any danger of contaminating the probe. In comparison to urine-derived LH with 60 to 250 IU LH/mg protein, the recombinant LH preparation contains 20,000 to 30,000 IU LH/mg protein.64

Along with the recombination of the isolated α- and β-subunits of the hormones, the whole process generates a highly sophisticated product with literally identical properties compared with the native hormone.

Recombinant LH was first studied in nonhuman primates.64 The pharmacokinetic trial, designed to compare and reveal possibly differences between pituitary, urine and recombinant LH and to ascertain the pharmacological properties, showed similar results for mean concentration time curves, mean clearance rates and half-life.

Gonadotropic treatment in HH women

HH describes a condition of very low or undetectable gonadotropins and subsequently arrested follicular growth with low estradiol levels, no ovulation and no menstrual bleeding. The accompanying infertility is the reason for the application of GnRH or gonadotropins to induce follicular growth and restore a normal chance to the patient to get pregnant. The majority of HH patient are scheduled for ovulation induction after monofollicular growth.

Pulsatile GnRH stimulation

Due to the most common cause of HH, the pulsatile GnRH treatment provides a suitable and effective strategy to restore a normal ovarian function.65 This therapy induces monofollicular development with physiological estradiol levels and subsequent luteal phase characteristics comparable to a complete normal ovarian function. The pulsatile GnRH treatment showed results slightly superior to HMG stimulation for cumulative pregnancy rate.15 Unfortunately, many patients displayed psychological problems and were irritated by the carrying of an electronic pump on their body for several days or weeks.

Gonadotropins (HMG, FSH, LH)

Daily injections of gonadotropins have been established as a more feasible and tolerated alternative for ovulation induction, with comparable results.66 This therapy can be administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injections of FSH alone or in combination with LH as urinary-derived HMG or more recently as a combination of recombinant FSH and LH. In contrast to the pulsatory GnRH therapy, one of the inherent dangers of this mainly non-physiological stimulation is an ovarian hyper-response with multiple follicular growth, followed by an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome67 and a higher risk of multiple pregnancies.15 In the normal menstrual cycle, FSH declines and LH rises during the follicular phase. FSH dominates the first half of the follicular phase and LH the second half, with the appearance of LH receptors on granulosa cells.33 The normal follicular phase starts with high FSH and low LH levels. Alongside the follicular growth FSH decreases and LH climbs continuously. HMG, with a fixed LH-FSH ratio, represents an non-physiological stimulation, because of the inability to adjust different LH-FSH ratios during the stimulation.

With the introduction of highly purified FSH and, later, recombinant FSH, gonadotropic stimulation became FSH dominated over the whole period, which is also completely different from the normal cycle.

Very early with the FSH-only stimulation strategy, the necessity of LH in HH women to achieve a normal follicular growth and oocyte maturation was questioned.53,68–73 These first studies demonstrated clearly that stimulation of ovulation induction with FSH alone in LH-depleted women leads to a much higher consumption of the gonadotropin combined with reduced follicular growth, dramatically lower estradiol levels and overall ovulation rates. These non-IVF studies left the unsolved question of whether or not the fertilization competence of the oocyte will be compromised. An IVF treatment in a HH woman, using a higher FSH dosage than normally given in ovulation induction cycles, showed clearly that an LH-free stimulation induces normal follicular growth with accompanying low estradiol level and without normal oocyte maturation and fertilization competence.74 The poor oocyte quality results directly from the insufficient LH secretion and is not caused by a low estradiol level.74 The oocyte requires both gonadotropins to achieve full maturation,75 but to what extent is not known.76

The second question on this topic is the influence of low estradiol level on the pregnancy rate.36 Animal studies had shown a clear dependency of the maturing process of the oocyte on normal estradiol levels.77,78 In humans, estradiol does not seem to be mandatory for the fertilization competence of the oocyte,74,79,80 but it is highly essential for pregnancy rate.81 Therefore, estradiol plays a key role in the normal development of the endometrium to achieve full receptivity to the embryo.

Gonadotropin stimulation in IVF patients as a LH depleted model

While FSH secretion could recognized as mandatory for normal follicular growth,38,53 some concerns were raised about the possibly of the deleterious influence of LH on oocyte fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome.82,83 High LH levels are known to be associated with a premature resumption of meiosis in exposed oocytes84 and an inhibition of the granulosa cell proliferation.50 Additionally, with reports of higher pregnancy rates in downregulated IVF patients using FSH compared with HMG,85 the gain from LH became questionable. These observations have led to a concept of a LH “ceiling” level, beyond which normal follicular growth and oocyte quality will be compromised by LH.86

Through the very low incidence of HH, many studies on the influence of LH on follicular growth and oocyte quality embraced downregulated patients undergoing an IVF procedure. The downregulation with GnRH analogs results in very low gonadotropin levels. Despite some very distinct differences between the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF and the monofollicular stimulation in HH women, only the IVF procedure provides the opportunity to verify the influence of the different gonadotropin preparations on stimulation success like oocyte maturation, fertilization competence and pregnancy rate.

Multiple studies have been done to prove the superiority of a distinct gonadotropin preparation, with very conflicting results.85,87–92 These differences can be traced back, at least partly, to the incomplete downregulation through the GnRH agonists or antagonists, where secretion of LH continues to be detectable93,94 in varing amounts.95 No doubt has been raised about the necessity of a distinct amount of LH to ensure the resumption of meiosis,96 the most crucial process to achieve full chromosomal integrity and oocyte diploidy.97 The discussion has focused on the impact of LH on oocyte maturation during the follicular phase. Even in massively downregulated women with LH levels near 1 U/L, no impact of these low LH levels on oocyte quality has been seen98 and stimulation with pure FSH did not fail to induce normal follicular growth.99 With the introduction of highly purified and, later, recombinant FSH for stimulation in downregulated (LH depleted) patients, the need for LH became uncertain.99 Westergaard et al100 demonstrated that midfollicular LH levels below 0.5 U/L do not compromise follicular growth, oocyte fertilization competence or pregnancy rate in downregulated IVF patients. However, this very low LH action (<0.5 U/L) during follicular development and oocyte maturation was related to an increased early pregnancy loss,100 with an impact on embryonic ploidy.92 Can this higher risk of abortion be traced back to an impact of the minimal LH secretion on oocyte/embryo quality? Or a possible lower estradiol increase along the stimulation in the low LH group with impact on the endometrium, since in both groups estradiol levels were ample and much higher than in a normal cycle.

A further meta-analysis reported lower ongoing pregnancy rates in women with follicular phase LH levels higher than 1.5 U/L and no impact of low LH levels.101 All these studies were done on downregulated patients undergoing an IVF procedure in order to prove the amount of LH necessary for the achievement of full fertilization competence of the oocyte. The use of the downregulated IVF patient as a model for HH women contains several limitations because the short-term suppression of LH and FSH in IVF cycles differs from the long lasting and more profound depletion of the gonadotropins in HH women.

Downregulated IVF patients display higher LH levels than HH women, depending on what GnRH analog was used.

Because IVF patients are mainly normally cycling women, the LH depletion period is much shorter than in HH women.

The intraovarian androgenetic milieu, necessary for normal oocyte maturation,34 differs completely.

Gonadotropin stimulation for ovulation induction in HH women

With the introduction of highly purified FSH and recombinant FSH, two preparations became available for FSH-only stimulation, even in HH women. Due to the rare incidence of HH, the first studies embraced just a few participants. In spite of these limitations, these first results showed clearly the necessity of a distinct amount of LH to achieve full oocyte maturation and ovulation competence.53,68–71,74

With respect to the studies discussed above on the influence of different gonadotropin preparations on oocyte quality in downregulated women undergoing an IVF procedure, a threshold level for LH was proposed, necessary for normal follicular development and oocyte maturation.76,102 Therefore, with a threshold and “ceiling” level of LH, Shoham postulated the concept of a therapeutic window for LH.102

Impact of FSH-only stimulation on cycle quality and follicular maturation

Stimulation studies with highly purified or recombinant FSH showed a clear correlation between remaining LH levels and stimulation outcome in HH women.1,53,70,103 Below a LH level of 1 U/L, FSH alone was not capable of stimulating follicular growth.104 An earlier study by Schoot et al70 clearly demonstrated, however, reduced follicular growth in 4 out of 7 women, all with LH levels below 0.5 U/L. Shoham et al73 reported on 2 HH women treated with recombinant FSH that both showed follicular growth with only a small increase in estradiol levels. This agrees with another study by Couzinet et al53 with an ovulation rate of 60%. In that study, women were treated with highly purified FSH, containing 0.09% LH bioactivity. In addition to the remaining circulating LH, the low LH activity was sufficient to sustain complete follicle maturation, since less than 1% of follicular LH receptors are needed to be stimulated by LH to maintain a proper follicular growth,105 in the presence of sufficient FSH.53

All these studies showed clearly that a FSH-only stimulation posseses limited value because of an insufficient follicular growth53,70,104,106 and oocyte maturation74 with an increased number of midsized follicles48 and very low estradiol levels,69,70,73,104 and a subsequent low endometrial score.1,71 A clear correlation can be found apparently between the degree of LH depletion and the higher amount of FSH ampoules needed for the stimulation.103

LH and FSH stimulation in HH women

Since there is no doubt about a FSH threshold level, an equally minimum LH level necessary for normal follicular growth in IVF and HH patients was debated. Although the discussion has been limited to the comparison between downregulated IVF patient and HH women, the attempts to improve pregnancy rates still focus on the effect of endogenous and exogenous LH.

The first studies in ovulation induction dealing with this topic utilized HMG15,53,68,71 or HCG107 as the only source of LH then available. These first studies showed the dependency of the maturing follicle on LH and FSH. As mentioned above, HMG has a fixed LH/FSH ratio without the chance to adjust the amount of LH and FSH for the stimulation protocol. With the introduction of recombinant FSH and LH, the possibility of an individually adjusted dosage and tailored LH/FSH ratio became available. Several studies have been conducted to prove the benefit of an LH and FSH combined stimulation in HH women 48,103,104,106,108 and the value of the LH threshold level.102

These studies provide results of high clinical relevance and will be discussed to briefly.

The European Recombinant Human LH Study Group first published their data in 1998.104 Thirty-eight women with HH were enrolled in the study and randomized into 4 LH treatment groups (Table 1.) All groups received a fixed FSH stimulation dose of 150 units (U) daily. In the placebo and the 25 U LH group, stimulation failed to induce sufficient follicular growth, with poor ovulation rates, and no pregnancy could be achieved. In the 75 and 225 U LH group, 80% to 100% received HCG to trigger ovulation, and 3 pregnancies were reported. Comparing the 75 and 225 U groups, stimulation with 225 U LH showed higher estradiol levels with a lower follicle count. This “ceiling” effect of LH will be discussed later. This was the first study that investigated intensively the influence of LH supplementation on FSH stimulation in HH women.

Table 1

Treatment and stimulation outcome104

No. patients	LH dosage (Units)	Ovulation induction (%)	Estradiol (pmol/L)
8	0	0*	60
7	25	33*	89
9	75	80*	855
10	225	100*	1598

p = 0.01.

Shoham et al106 reported on a study, including 39 patients, to compare FSH-only stimulation with a combined FSH/LH stimulation, both with a fixed FSH dosage of 150 U daily. The LH group showed a much higher success in follicular growth than the FSH-only group (Table 2.)

Table 2

Treatment and stimulation outcome106

No. patients	LH dosage (Units)	Follicular growth (%)	Estradiol (pmol/L)
13	0	2 (15,4%)*	370
26	75	17 (65.4%)*	1240

p = 0.006.

Both studies demonstrated an impressive enhancement of follicular growth through LH supplementation.

Burgues et al,103 Kaufmann et al1 and O’Dea et al108 investigated the ability of LH/FSH combined stimulation to adjust gonadotropin dosage. All studies reported on comparable results of follicular growth (74%–87%), with a clinical pregnancy rate of 22% per HCG given cycle and a cumulative pregnancy rate (up to 3 cycles) of 74%.

The overall results from these studies demonstrate a clear benefit of LH in the stimulation of HH women. Besides a reduction in FSH ampoules needed,103 all investigators reported on high rates of normal follicular growth, from 66% to 87%.1,103,106,108 Through the action of LH and even in the presence of high FSH stimulation, a trend toward fewer midsized follicles or a less severe ovarian over-response could be observed,1,48 and subsequently a lower risk of an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or multiple pregnancies.67 Ovulation rates reached were also very high (up to 90%).103,104 Compared with a FSH-only stimulation, the addition of LH led to higher preovulatory estradiol levels48,104 and a better endometrium score.106 The mid-luteal progesterone levels were found to be two-fold higher in the FSH/LH group than in the FSH-only group.1 Pregnancy rates per cycle reached 22%103 and 29%,104 and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 74% over a maximum of 3 treatment cycles was achieved.108

These study results gave interesting insights into the mechanisms of proper follicular growth and the minimum (and maximum) amounts of LH and FSH needed to ensure a normal follicular growth.

The studies with HH women showed a clear dependency of normal follicular growth on a distinct amount of LH, the LH threshold level.102 The value of this threshold level was calculated with 1.2 U/L106 and rejected.104 Due to the limitations of the measurement of a hormone and particularly near the lower detection level, these different points of view reflect partly the difficulties of comparing hormone levels from different laboratories with different methods. Therefore, the measurement of circulating immunoreactive LH has only limited value to detect a LH-insufficient patient.81,103,105 From a more practical viewpoint, Burgues et al103 recommended a stimulation with 75 U LH daily in HH women with basal LH levels above 1 U/L and a higher LH dosage in women with more profound LH depletion. On the other hand, another group reported on a sufficient stimulation with 75 U of LH daily in HH women with LH levels below 1 U/L, and these LH levels did not rise during stimulation.104 Both groups utilized 150 U FSH for daily injection. The debate on the LH threshold level will go further with the publication of new studies. Until now, the great value of substituting stimulation with LH for FSH in HH women has been clearly described and should become established in normal practice.

All those studies showed convincingly that FSH stimulation supplemented with recombinant LH is superior to FSH-only stimulation in HH women.

With the availability of recombinant LH, another LH-related concept could be proved: the LH “ceiling” effect.86 And, in fact, an increasing LH dosage will be able to minimize or stop the additional development of midsized follicles and reduce or avoid multiple ovulations.48,104 With the occurrence of LH receptors on granulosa cells, LH-only stimulation will be able to sustain follicular growth, but only at high levels.47,48

The LH “ceiling” concept could be an interesting alternative in case of unwanted multiple follicular growths. The cessation of FSH stimulation and a high LH dosage enables a reduction in follicle count, and could avoid or even limit multiple ovulations and therefore minimize the risk of an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or multiple pregnancies.67