Literature DB >> 10779836

Effects of preferred hand and sex on the perception of tactile simultaneity.

G Geffen1, V Rosa, M Luciano.   

Abstract

The effects of handedness, sex and the influence of hand placement in extrapersonal space on temporal information processing was investigated by measuring thresholds for perceiving the simultaneity of pairs of tactile stimuli. Simultaneity thresholds of preferred right handed and left handed university students with left hemisphere speech representation were compared using unimanual and bimanual stimulation at three hand placements (midline, lateral and crossed). In unimanual conditions two fingers of one hand were stimulated (single hemisphere), whereas in the bimanual conditions one finger of each hand was stimulated (cross hemispheres). Bimanual minus unimanual thresholds provided an estimate of interhemisphere transmission time (IHTT) regardless of hand placement. The effects of hemispace varied with the type of stimulation. With unimanual stimulation, overall thresholds were longer at the midline placement, however, with bimanual stimulation, thresholds were longer when the hands were spatially separated (crossed and/or uncrossed). Left handers' IHTTs were 8 ms faster than those of right handers. IHTTs in males were faster than females with hands placed in lateral (by 10.8 ms) or crossed (by 9.8 ms) but not midline positions. It was concluded that the cerebral hemispheres are equally capable of discriminating temporal intervals, but that the left hemisphere predominates when there is uncertainty about location of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10779836     DOI: 10.1076/1380-3395(200004)22:2;1-1;FT219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing.

Authors:  Shinobu Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Naoki Kawakami; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural timing signal for precise tactile timing judgments.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sub-Second Temporal Integration of Vibro-Tactile Stimuli: Intervals between Adjacent, Weak, and Within-Channel Stimuli Are Underestimated.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Takumi Yokosaka; Junji Watanabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-31

6.  Human tactile detection of within- and inter-finger spatiotemporal phase shifts of low-frequency vibrations.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sensitivity to haptic sound-localisation cues.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Haptic sound-localisation for use in cochlear implant and hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Trunk rotation and handedness modulate cortical activation in neglect-associated regions during temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Kerstin Paschke; Mathias Bähr; Torsten Wüstenberg; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.881

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.