Literature DB >> 33431929

Sensitivity to haptic sound-localisation cues.

Mark D Fletcher1,2, Jana Zgheib3, Samuel W Perry3,4.   

Abstract

Hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) users often struggle to locate and segregate sounds. The dominant sound-localisation cues are time and intensity differences across the ears. A recent study showed that CI users locate sounds substantially better when these cues are provided through haptic stimulation on each wrist. However, the sensitivity of the wrists to these cues and the robustness of this sensitivity to aging is unknown. The current study showed that time difference sensitivity is much poorer across the wrists than across the ears and declines with age. In contrast, high sensitivity to across-wrist intensity differences was found that was robust to aging. This high sensitivity was observed across a range of stimulation intensities for both amplitude modulated and unmodulated sinusoids and matched across-ear intensity difference sensitivity for normal-hearing individuals. Furthermore, the usable dynamic range for haptic stimulation on the wrists was found to be around four times larger than for CIs. These findings suggest that high-precision haptic sound-localisation can be achieved, which could aid many hearing-impaired listeners. Furthermore, the finding that high-fidelity across-wrist intensity information can be transferred could be exploited in human-machine interfaces to enhance virtual reality and improve remote control of military, medical, or research robots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431929      PMCID: PMC7801733          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79150-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  47 in total

1.  Monaural and interaural intensity discrimination: level effects and the "binaural advantage".

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging brain, aging mind.

Authors:  D J Selkoe
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Effects of stimulus duration on the amplitude difference limen for vibrotaction.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; J J Zwislocki; A Rasmussen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Wearable Haptic Systems for the Fingertip and the Hand: Taxonomy, Review, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio Pacchierotti; Stephen Sinclair; Massimiliano Solazzi; Antonio Frisoli; Vincent Hayward; Domenico Prattichizzo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Change in vibrotactile thresholds as a function of age.

Authors:  R T Verrillo
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-03

6.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Authors:  B A Wright; M B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans.

Authors:  D R Kenshalo
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1986-11

8.  Sound Source Localization by Normal-Hearing Listeners, Hearing-Impaired Listeners and Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Louise H Loiselle; Sarah J Cook; William A Yost; René H Gifford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions.

Authors:  Meg Stuart; A Bulent Turman; Jacqueline Shaw; Natalie Walsh; Vincent Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Electro-haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in spatially separated noise for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Haoheng Song; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.