AIM: To determine whether distinct symptom groupings exist in a constipated population and whether such grouping might correlate with quantifiable pathophysiological measures of colonic dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-one patients presenting to a Gastroenterology clinic with constipation and 32 constipated patients responding to a newspaper advertisement completed a 53-item, wide-ranging self-report questionnaire. One hundred of these patients had colonic transit measured scintigraphically. Factor analysis determined whether constipation-related symptoms grouped into distinct aspects of symptomatology. Cluster analysis was used to determine whether individual patients naturally group into distinct subtypes. RESULTS: Cluster analysis yielded a 4 cluster solution with the presence or absence of pain and laxative unresponsiveness providing the main descriptors. Amongst all clusters there was a considerable proportion of patients with demonstrable delayed colon transit, irritable bowel syndrome positive criteria and regular stool frequency. The majority of patients with these characteristics also reported regular laxative use. CONCLUSION: Factor analysis identified four constipation subgroups, based on severity and laxative unresponsiveness, in a constipated population. However, clear stratification into clinically identifiable groups remains imprecise.
AIM: To determine whether distinct symptom groupings exist in a constipated population and whether such grouping might correlate with quantifiable pathophysiological measures of colonic dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-one patients presenting to a Gastroenterology clinic with constipation and 32 constipatedpatients responding to a newspaper advertisement completed a 53-item, wide-ranging self-report questionnaire. One hundred of these patients had colonic transit measured scintigraphically. Factor analysis determined whether constipation-related symptoms grouped into distinct aspects of symptomatology. Cluster analysis was used to determine whether individual patients naturally group into distinct subtypes. RESULTS: Cluster analysis yielded a 4 cluster solution with the presence or absence of pain and laxative unresponsiveness providing the main descriptors. Amongst all clusters there was a considerable proportion of patients with demonstrable delayed colon transit, irritable bowel syndrome positive criteria and regular stool frequency. The majority of patients with these characteristics also reported regular laxative use. CONCLUSION: Factor analysis identified four constipation subgroups, based on severity and laxative unresponsiveness, in a constipated population. However, clear stratification into clinically identifiable groups remains imprecise.
Authors: R G McLean; R C Smart; D Gaston-Parry; S Barbagallo; J Baker; N R Lyons; C E Bruck; D W King; D Z Lubowski; N A Talley Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Philip G Dinning; Peter A Bampton; Julie Andre; Michael L Kennedy; David Z Lubowski; Denis W King; Ian J Cook Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Phil G Dinning; Linda Hunt; Vicki Patton; Teng Zhang; Michal Szczesniak; Val Gebski; Mike Jones; Peter Stewart; David Z Lubowski; Ian J Cook Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: V Patton; V Balakrishnan; C Pieri; P Doherty; K C Phan-Thien; D W King; D Z Lubowski Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Phil G Dinning; Linda Hunt; David Z Lubowski; Jamshid S Kalantar; Ian J Cook; Mike P Jones Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Diane L'Heureux-Bouron; Sophie Legrain-Raspaud; Helen R Carruthers; P J Whorwell Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2018-04-22 Impact factor: 4.409