Literature DB >> 20859606

[Protective stoma after deep anterior rectal resection: pro].

A Ulrich1, J Weitz, M W Büchler.   

Abstract

There is still controversy about the necessity of a diverting stoma after deep anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Recent results of randomized controlled trials and from systematic reviews have improved the currently available data. A significant benefit was shown for patients with diverting stoma in terms of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage and re-operation rates. The influence on mortality is not as clear. However, analysis of the data of 19 prospective studies within a systematic review including more than 9,000 patients, revealed a significant benefit for stoma creation. Furthermore, the rate of patients with stoma 5 years after primary resection was lower in the group of patients with diverting stoma. The purpose of this manuscript is to show the necessity of a diverting stoma based on the currently available data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20859606     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-010-1928-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  18 in total

1.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Junji Kishimoto; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor.

Authors:  Alexis B Ulrich; Christoph Seiler; Nuh Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Arbman; E Nilsson; O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Lefebure; J J Tuech; V Bridoux; B Costaglioli; M Scotte; P Teniere; F Michot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brisinda; Serafino Vanella; Federica Cadeddu; Ignazio Massimo Civello; Francesco Brandara; Casimiro Nigro; Pasquale Mazzeo; Gaia Marniga; Giorgio Maria
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 8.  [Rectal cancer. How much radiotherapy do surgery patients need?].

Authors:  A Ulrich; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study.

Authors:  H Graffner; P Fredlund; S A Olsson; J Oscarson; B G Petersson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Neoadjuvant treatment does not influence perioperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alexis Ulrich; Jürgen Weitz; Matthias Slodczyk; Moritz Koch; Dirk Jaeger; Marc Münter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.