Literature DB >> 10768746

The seismocardiogram as magnetic-field-compatible alternative to the electrocardiogram for cardiac stress monitoring.

M Jerosch-Herold1, J Zanetti, H Merkle, L Poliac, H Huang, A Mansoor, F Zhao, N Wilke.   

Abstract

Seismocardiography (SCG) is a methodology derived from the field of seismology to measure non-invasively compression waves generated by myocardial motion. The use of SCG is proposed here as method to monitor cardiac function during stress testing and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is shown that recording of the seismocardiogram in subjects undergoing an MRI study is not compromised by flow-induced electrical voltages that can severely distort the electrocardiogram. Electromagnetic compatibility of the seismocardiograph device with the MRI scanner hardware was tested. Experiments in an animal model proved that changes in the SCG waveform during different levels of LAD stenosis correlate with the changes seen in LV function with cine MRI. The changes in the SCG waveform characteristic for the onset of ischemia were observed almost immediately after the creation of a flow-limiting stenosis. This novel application of SCG to monitor changes in peak acceleration from cardiac blood flow and wall motion may represent a solution to the long-standing and important problem of monitoring patients for signs of myocardial ischemia during MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10768746     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006364518204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  14 in total

1.  Minimizing interference from magnetic resonance imagers during electrocardiography.

Authors:  M K Laudon; J G Webster; R Frayne; T M Grist
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Hall effect imaging.

Authors:  H Wen; J Shah; R S Balaban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Comparison of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, mechanical, and metabolic indicators of intraoperative myocardial ischemia in vascular surgical patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Häggmark; P Hohner; M Ostman; A Friedman; G Diamond; E Lowenstein; S Reiz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Suppression of radiofrequency interference in cardiac gated MRI: a simple design.

Authors:  A N Shetty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  ASA monitoring standards and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N H Jorgensen; J M Messick; J Gray; M Nugent; T H Berquist
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Value of regional wall motion abnormality in the emergency room diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  P Sabia; A Afrookteh; D A Touchstone; M W Keller; L Esquivel; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Optimizing electrocardiograph electrode placement for cardiac-gated magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R N Dimick; L W Hedlund; R J Herfkens; E K Fram; J Utz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of seismocardiography compared with electrocardiography for the anatomic and physiologic diagnosis of coronary artery disease during exercise testing.

Authors:  R A Wilson; V S Bamrah; J Lindsay; M Schwaiger; J Morganroth
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Regional myocardial blood volume and flow: first-pass MR imaging with polylysine-Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  N Wilke; K Kroll; H Merkle; Y Wang; Y Ishibashi; Y Xu; J Zhang; M Jerosch-Herold; A Mühler; A E Stillman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Seismocardiography for monitoring changes in left ventricular function during ischemia.

Authors:  D M Salerno; J Zanetti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  5 in total

1.  A trimodal system for the acquisition of synchronous echocardiography, electrocardiography, and seismocardiography data.

Authors:  Carson A Wick; Jin-Jyh Su; Oliver Brand; James H McClellan; Pamela T Bhatti; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Detecting Aortic Valve-Induced Abnormal Flow with Seismocardiography and Cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Ethan M I Johnson; J Alex Heller; Florencia Garcia Vicente; Roberto Sarnari; Daniel Gordon; Patrick M McCarthy; Alex J Barker; Mozziyar Etemadi; Michael Markl
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance image-guided versus ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Pei-Hong Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-14

4.  Automatic Identification of Systolic Time Intervals in Seismocardiogram.

Authors:  Ghufran Shafiq; Sivanagaraja Tatinati; Wei Tech Ang; Kalyana C Veluvolu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Artifact Noise Removal Techniques on Seismocardiogram Using Two Tri-Axial Accelerometers.

Authors:  Loc Luu; Anh Dinh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.