Literature DB >> 7978439

ASA monitoring standards and magnetic resonance imaging.

N H Jorgensen1, J M Messick, J Gray, M Nugent, T H Berquist.   

Abstract

Some patients, often because of age or altered mental state, require general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care and sedation if adequate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is to be accomplished. This study evaluated whether patients can be monitored during MRI with 1.5-tesla scanners in a manner which complies with ASA monitoring standards without causing degradation of image quality. Ten volunteers were scanned in the MRI without sedation. Monitors meeting ASA standards were placed and electronic artifact produced by the magnetic resonance (MR) scanner was evaluated, after which two scans of the head and two of the chest were performed. One of each pair of scans was obtained with the monitors functioning and one with them turned off. Four radiologists, blinded as to whether the monitors were turned on or off, independently evaluated the 20 pairs of scans. Differences in diagnostic quality and image degradation between the scans were evaluated and scores assigned. All monitors functioned appropriately during the scans, with the exception of the electrocardiogram (ECG) which was grossly distorted to the extent that only ventricular rate could be evaluated. None of the head or body scans was nondiagnostic; however, images with the monitors off were of better quality overall than with them on. Two types of noise were generated and are described. During the head scans, three of seven monitoring combinations caused degradation of the images, while four were judged clinically adequate. During the body scans, two of six monitoring combinations created noticeable noise, while four introduced no significant noise. Ungated cardiac scans were nondiagnostic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7978439     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199412000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  The seismocardiogram as magnetic-field-compatible alternative to the electrocardiogram for cardiac stress monitoring.

Authors:  M Jerosch-Herold; J Zanetti; H Merkle; L Poliac; H Huang; A Mansoor; F Zhao; N Wilke
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-12

2.  Monitoring oxygenation and ventilation during magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  C Bell; A H Conte
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-01

3.  Anaesthesia for Paediatric Cardiac MRI.

Authors:  D K Sreevastava; R Setlur
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 4.  Risk and safety concerns in anesthesiology practice: The present perspective.

Authors:  Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Jasbir Kaur
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.