Literature DB >> 16032407

Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.

Kimberlee Jordan1, Brian I Hyland, Jeffery R Wickens, J Greg Anson.   

Abstract

The effect on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) of remembering which one of several targets to move to was investigated in 18 participants who completed 416 trials in each task. On each trial, participants moved their index finger from a central, illuminated switch (the stimulus) to one of eight targets located on the circumference of a 6 cm radius circle. A visual cue (illumination of the target) informed the participant of the appropriate target. In the memorised delay task, the cued target was lit for 300 ms followed by a variable (450-750 ms) foreperiod during which the participant was required to remember the location of the target until the stimulus light was extinguished. In the non-memorised delay task, the target remained lit during the entire foreperiod (750-1050 ms) until the response was completed. At the "go" signal (stimulus light extinguished) participants moved as quickly and accurately as possible to the cued target. Both RT and MT were significantly (p<0.05) longer in the memorised delay task. The increase in RT shows that remembering which target imposed a greater load on motor preparation even though all the information needed for preparing the response was presented in the cue at the beginning of each trial. The increase in MT raises the possibility that movement execution was also programmed during motor preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16032407     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2348-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  A systematic directional error in 2-D arm movements increases with increasing delay between visual target presentation and movement execution.

Authors:  N Smyrnis; P Gourtzelidis; I Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.

Authors:  E T KLEMMER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-03

3.  Further argument for the existence of a pacemaker in the human information processing system.

Authors:  B Burle; M Bonnet
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1997-11

4.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Interruption of motor cortical discharge subserving aimed arm movements.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; J T Massey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

7.  Performance norms for a rhesus monkey neuropsychological testing battery: acquisition and long-term performance.

Authors:  M R Weed; M A Taffe; I Polis; A C Roberts; T W Robbins; G F Koob; F E Bloom; L H Gold
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

8.  Activation of the arousal response can impair performance on a simple motor task.

Authors:  J T Noteboom; M Fleshner; R M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-08

9.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Performance of the marmoset monkey on computerized tasks of attention and working memory.

Authors:  Simona Spinelli; Luis Pennanen; Andrea C Dettling; Joram Feldon; Guy A Higgins; Christopher R Pryce
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.