Literature DB >> 10754068

The contributions of replication orientation, gene direction, and signal sequences to base-composition asymmetries in bacterial genomes.

E R Tillier1, R A Collins.   

Abstract

Asymmetries in base composition between the leading and the lagging strands have been observed previously in many prokaryotic genomes. Since a majority of genes is encoded on the leading strand in these genomes, previous analyses have not been able to determine the relative contribution to the base composition skews of replication processes and transcriptional and/or translational forces. Using qualitative graphical presentations and quantitative statistical analyses (analysis of variance), we have found that a significant proportion of the GC and AT skews can be attributed to replication orientation, i.e., the sequence of a gene is influenced by whether it is encoded on the leading or lagging strand. This effect of replication orientation on skews is independent of, and can be opposite in sign to, the effects of transcriptional or translational processes, such as selection for codon usage, amino acid preferences, expression levels (inferred from codon adaptation index), or potential short signal sequences (e.g., chi sequences). Mutational differences between the leading and the lagging strands are the most likely explanation for a significant proportion of the base composition skew in these bacterial genomes. The finding that base composition skews due to replication orientation are independent of those due to selection for function of the encoded protein may complicate the interpretation of phylogenetic relationships, conserved positions in nucleotide or amino acid sequence alignments, and codon usage patterns.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10754068     DOI: 10.1007/s002399910029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  69 in total

1.  Mining Bacillus subtilis chromosome heterogeneities using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Pierre Nicolas; Laurent Bize; Florence Muri; Mark Hoebeke; François Rodolphe; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bernard Prum; Philippe Bessières
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Genome sequence of an M3 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes reveals a large-scale genomic rearrangement in invasive strains and new insights into phage evolution.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Kurokawa; Atsushi Yamashita; Masanobu Nakata; Yusuke Tomiyasu; Nobuo Okahashi; Shigetada Kawabata; Kiyoshi Yamazaki; Tadayoshi Shiba; Teruo Yasunaga; Hideo Hayashi; Masahira Hattori; Shigeyuki Hamada
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Strand compositional asymmetries of nuclear DNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Deng K Niu; Kui Lin; Da-Yong Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Where does bacterial replication start? Rules for predicting the oriC region.

Authors:  Pawel Mackiewicz; Jolanta Zakrzewska-Czerwinska; Anna Zawilak; Miroslaw R Dudek; Stanislaw Cebrat
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Transcription-coupled and splicing-coupled strand asymmetries in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Alain Arneodo; Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa; Claude Thermes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias.

Authors:  Paul M Sharp; Laura R Emery; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Distinctive architecture of the chloroplast genome in the chlorophycean green alga Stigeoclonium helveticum.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Bélanger; Jean-Simon Brouard; Patrick Charlebois; Christian Otis; Claude Lemieux; Monique Turmel
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Genomic comparison of archaeal conjugative plasmids from Sulfolobus.

Authors:  Bo Greve; Susanne Jensen; Kim Brügger; Wolfram Zillig; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.273

9.  Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Marie Touchon; Edward J Feil
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Evolutionary advantage of directional symmetry breaking in self-replicating polymers.

Authors:  Hemachander Subramanian; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.