Literature DB >> 17068325

Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects.

Eduardo P C Rocha1, Marie Touchon, Edward J Feil.   

Abstract

Compositional replication strand bias, commonly referred to as GC skew, is present in many genomes of prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and viruses. Although cytosine deamination in ssDNA (resulting in C-->T changes on the leading strand) is often invoked as its major cause, the precise contributions of this and other substitution types are currently unknown. It is also unclear if the underlying mutational asymmetries are the same among taxa, are stable over time, or how closely the observed biases are to mutational equilibrium. We analyzed nearly neutral sites of seven taxa each with between three and six complete bacterial genomes, and inferred the substitution spectra of fourfold degenerate positions in nonhighly expressed genes. Using a bootstrap procedure, we extracted compositional biases associated with replication and identified the significant asymmetries. Although all taxa showed an overrepresentation of G relative to C on the leading strand (and imbalances between A and T), widely variable substitution asymmetries are noted. Surprisingly, all substitution types show significant asymmetry in at least one taxon, but none were universally biased in all taxa. Notably, in the two most biased genomes, A-->G, rather than C-->T, shapes the compositional bias. Given the variability in these biases, we propose that the process is multifactorial. Finally, we also find that most genomes are not at compositional equilibrium, and suggest that mutational-based heterotachy is deeply imprinted in the history of biological macromolecules. This shows that similar compositional biases associated with the same essential well-conserved process, replication, do not reflect similar mutational processes in different genomes, and that caution is required in inferring the roles of specific mutational biases on the basis of contemporary patterns of sequence composition.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068325      PMCID: PMC1665637          DOI: 10.1101/gr.5525106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  71 in total

1.  The contributions of replication orientation, gene direction, and signal sequences to base-composition asymmetries in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  E R Tillier; R A Collins
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Is there a role for replication fork asymmetry in the distribution of genes in bacterial genomes?

Authors:  Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 17.079

3.  Correlations between genomic GC levels and optimal growth temperatures in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Héctor Musto; Hugo Naya; Alejandro Zavala; Héctor Romero; Fernando Alvarez-Valín; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  DNA primase acts as a molecular brake in DNA replication.

Authors:  Jong-Bong Lee; Richard K Hite; Samir M Hamdan; X Sunney Xie; Charles C Richardson; Antoine M van Oijen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Identification of oligonucleotide sequences that direct the movement of the Escherichia coli FtsK translocase.

Authors:  Oren Levy; Jerod L Ptacin; Paul J Pease; Jeff Gore; Michael B Eisen; Carlos Bustamante; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).

Authors:  S D Bentley; K F Chater; A-M Cerdeño-Tárraga; G L Challis; N R Thomson; K D James; D E Harris; M A Quail; H Kieser; D Harper; A Bateman; S Brown; G Chandra; C W Chen; M Collins; A Cronin; A Fraser; A Goble; J Hidalgo; T Hornsby; S Howarth; C-H Huang; T Kieser; L Larke; L Murphy; K Oliver; S O'Neil; E Rabbinowitsch; M-A Rajandream; K Rutherford; S Rutter; K Seeger; D Saunders; S Sharp; R Squares; S Squares; K Taylor; T Warren; A Wietzorrek; J Woodward; B G Barrell; J Parkhill; D A Hopwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Characteristics of Chi distribution on different bacterial genomes.

Authors:  M El Karoui; V Biaudet; S Schbath; A Gruss
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.992

9.  Ongoing evolution of strand composition in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  E P Rocha; A Danchin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Base composition skews, replication orientation, and gene orientation in 12 prokaryote genomes.

Authors:  M J McLean; K H Wolfe; K M Devine
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  48 in total

1.  Genome rhetoric and the emergence of compositional bias.

Authors:  Kalin Vetsigian; Nigel Goldenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Linking the DNA strand asymmetry to the spatio-temporal replication program. I. About the role of the replication fork polarity in genome evolution.

Authors:  A Baker; H Julienne; C L Chen; B Audit; Y d'Aubenton-Carafa; C Thermes; A Arneodo
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Distinguishing microbial genome fragments based on their composition: evolutionary and comparative genomic perspectives.

Authors:  Scott C Perry; Robert G Beiko
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Long-range bidirectional strand asymmetries originate at CpG islands in the human genome.

Authors:  Paz Polak; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  New views on strand asymmetry in insect mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Shu-Jun Wei; Min Shi; Xue-Xin Chen; Michael J Sharkey; Cornelis van Achterberg; Gong-Yin Ye; Jun-Hua He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The evolution of transcription-associated biases of mutations across vertebrates.

Authors:  Paz Polak; Robert Querfurth; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Codon usages of genes on chromosome, and surprisingly, genes in plasmid are primarily affected by strand-specific mutational biases in Lawsonia intracellularis.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Jian-Bo Yuan
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Inverse symmetry in complete genomes and whole-genome inverse duplication.

Authors:  Sing-Guan Kong; Wen-Lang Fan; Hong-Da Chen; Zi-Ting Hsu; Nengji Zhou; Bo Zheng; Hoong-Chien Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  DNA asymmetric strand bias affects the amino acid composition of mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Xiang Jia Min; Donal A Hickey
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Macronuclear genome structure of the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis: single-gene chromosomes and tiny introns.

Authors:  Guénola Ricard; Rob M de Graaf; Bas E Dutilh; I Duarte; Theo A van Alen; Angela Ham van Hoek; Brigitte Boxma; Georg W M van der Staay; Seung Yeo Moon-van der Staay; Wei-Jen Chang; Laura F Landweber; Johannes H P Hackstein; Martijn A Huynen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.