Literature DB >> 14629042

Strand compositional asymmetries of nuclear DNA in eukaryotes.

Deng K Niu1, Kui Lin, Da-Yong Zhang.   

Abstract

Both DNA replication and transcription are structurally asymmetric processes. An asymmetric nucleotide substitution pattern has been observed between the leading and the lagging strand, and between the coding and the noncoding strand, in eubacterial, viral, and organelle genomes. Similar studies in eukaryotes have been rare, because the origins of replication in nuclear genomes are mostly unknown and the replicons are much shorter than those of prokaryotes. To circumvent these predicaments, all possible pairs of neighboring genes that are located on different strands of nuclear DNA were selected from the complete genomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Plasmodium falciparum, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Anopheles gambiae, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens. For such a pair of genes, one is likely coded from the leading strand and the other from the lagging strand. By examining the introns and the fourfold degenerate sites of codons in the genes of each pair, we found that the relative frequencies of T vs. A and of G vs. C are significantly skewed in most eukaryotes studied. In a gene pair, the potential effects of replication- and transcription-associated mutation bias on strand asymmetry are in the same direction for one gene where leading strand synthesis shares the same template with transcription, while they tend to be canceled out in the other gene. Our study demonstrates that DNA replication-associated and transcription-associated mutation bias and/or selective codon usage bias may affect the strand nucleotide composition asymmetrically in eukaryotic genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629042     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-003-2483-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  47 in total

1.  The contributions of replication orientation, gene direction, and signal sequences to base-composition asymmetries in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  E R Tillier; R A Collins
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A sensitive genetic assay for the detection of cytosine deamination: determination of rate constants and the activation energy.

Authors:  L A Frederico; T A Kunkel; B R Shaw
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-03-13       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Initiation at closely spaced replication origins in a yeast chromosome.

Authors:  B J Brewer; W L Fangman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ongoing evolution of strand composition in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  E P Rocha; A Danchin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Replication dynamics of the yeast genome.

Authors:  M K Raghuraman; E A Winzeler; D Collingwood; S Hunt; L Wodicka; A Conway; D J Lockhart; R W Davis; B J Brewer; W L Fangman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Unequal fidelity of leading strand and lagging strand DNA replication on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; P Jonczyk; M M Tkaczyk; M Bialoskorska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Life with 6000 genes.

Authors:  A Goffeau; B G Barrell; H Bussey; R W Davis; B Dujon; H Feldmann; F Galibert; J D Hoheisel; C Jacq; M Johnston; E J Louis; H W Mewes; Y Murakami; P Philippsen; H Tettelin; S G Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Base composition skews, replication orientation, and gene orientation in 12 prokaryote genomes.

Authors:  M J McLean; K H Wolfe; K M Devine
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 10.  Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Transcription-coupled and splicing-coupled strand asymmetries in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Alain Arneodo; Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa; Claude Thermes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Strand compositional asymmetries in vertebrate large genes.

Authors:  Hai-Fang Wang; Wen-Ru Hou; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  DNA replication origins in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome.

Authors:  Jianli Dai; Ray-Yuan Chuang; Thomas J Kelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  GraphDNA: a Java program for graphical display of DNA composition analyses.

Authors:  Jamie M Thomas; Daniel Horspool; Gordon Brown; Vasily Tcherepanov; Chris Upton
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Evolutionary advantage of anti-parallel strand orientation of duplex DNA.

Authors:  Hemachander Subramanian; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  System analysis of synonymous codon usage biases in archaeal virus genomes.

Authors:  Sen Li; Jie Yang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  DNA asymmetric strand bias affects the amino acid composition of mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Xiang Jia Min; Donal A Hickey
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences.

Authors:  Kenneth J Evans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Strand bias structure in mouse DNA gives a glimpse of how chromatin structure affects gene expression.

Authors:  Kenneth J Evans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Mutational pattern and frequency of induced nucleotide changes in mouse ENU mutagenesis.

Authors:  K Ryo Takahasi; Yoshiyuki Sakuraba; Yoichi Gondo
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.946

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.