R Fries1, O Wendler, H Schieffer, H J Schäfers. 1. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospitals Homburg, Homburg/Saar, Germany. fries@med-in.uni-sb.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic superiority of stentless valves at rest has been generally accepted, but there is a lack of studies on exercise hemodynamics. METHODS: We assessed aortic valve hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in 10 patients with a 23-mm stentless aortic bioprosthesis (Medtronic Freestyle; Medtronic Europe SA/NV, St. Stevens Woluwe, Belgium), in 10 patients with a 23-mm stented aortic bioprosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards, SAV, model 2650; Baxter Edwards AG, Horw, Switzerland), and in 10 healthy volunteers (control group) by means of Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Gradients at rest and gradients on comparable maximum exercise levels were significantly lower in patients with stentless valves compared to those with stented valves (rest: 6 +/- 2/11 +/- 4 mm Hg [mean/peak] versus 12 +/- 3/21 +/- 10 mm Hg; exercise: 9 +/- 3/18 +/- 6 mm Hg [mean/peak] versus 22 +/- 8/40 +/- 11 mm Hg). Patients with stentless valves revealed, in comparison to healthy young men, significantly higher gradients, but the small gradient difference of 3/7 mm Hg (mean/peak) at rest remained nearly unchanged throughout the exercise protocol (4/8 mm Hg [mean/peak] at 25 W, 4/9 mm Hg at 50 W and 4/9 mm Hg at 75 W). In contrast, the gradient difference between patients with stented and stentless valves increased significantly from one exercise level to the next (6/12 mm Hg [mean/peak] at rest, 8/14 mm Hg at 25 W, 12/17 mm Hg at 50 W, and 15/25 mm Hg at 75 W). CONCLUSIONS: A stentless aortic bioprosthesis seems to be an appropriate aortic valve substitute, especially in patients who perform regular physical exercise.
BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic superiority of stentless valves at rest has been generally accepted, but there is a lack of studies on exercise hemodynamics. METHODS: We assessed aortic valve hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in 10 patients with a 23-mm stentless aortic bioprosthesis (Medtronic Freestyle; Medtronic Europe SA/NV, St. Stevens Woluwe, Belgium), in 10 patients with a 23-mm stented aortic bioprosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards, SAV, model 2650; Baxter Edwards AG, Horw, Switzerland), and in 10 healthy volunteers (control group) by means of Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Gradients at rest and gradients on comparable maximum exercise levels were significantly lower in patients with stentless valves compared to those with stented valves (rest: 6 +/- 2/11 +/- 4 mm Hg [mean/peak] versus 12 +/- 3/21 +/- 10 mm Hg; exercise: 9 +/- 3/18 +/- 6 mm Hg [mean/peak] versus 22 +/- 8/40 +/- 11 mm Hg). Patients with stentless valves revealed, in comparison to healthy young men, significantly higher gradients, but the small gradient difference of 3/7 mm Hg (mean/peak) at rest remained nearly unchanged throughout the exercise protocol (4/8 mm Hg [mean/peak] at 25 W, 4/9 mm Hg at 50 W and 4/9 mm Hg at 75 W). In contrast, the gradient difference between patients with stented and stentless valves increased significantly from one exercise level to the next (6/12 mm Hg [mean/peak] at rest, 8/14 mm Hg at 25 W, 12/17 mm Hg at 50 W, and 15/25 mm Hg at 75 W). CONCLUSIONS: A stentless aortic bioprosthesis seems to be an appropriate aortic valve substitute, especially in patients who perform regular physical exercise.
Authors: Bo Yang; Himanshu J Patel; Elizabeth L Norton; Christina Debenedictus; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Kevin He; Whitney E Hornsby; Donald S Likosky; G Michael Deeb Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 32.419