Literature DB >> 10728256

Measuring satisfaction among low-income women: a prenatal care questionnaire.

K Raube1, A Handler, D Rosenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and construct validity of a prenatal care satisfaction scale.
METHOD: A prenatal care satisfaction scale that included six dimensions of care based on the literature was tested during a telephone interview with 101 first-time African-American and Mexican-American mothers 18 and over who receive Medicaid.
RESULTS: The scale exhibited high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), as well as good construct validity. The correlation between the scale and rating of the quality of care overall was 0.74 (p < 0.001); the correlation between the scale and whether the women would recommend this provider to a friend was 0.67 (p < 0.001). Results from correlation and factor analysis suggested a different set of dimensions than those described in the literature.
CONCLUSION: The 22-question satisfaction with prenatal care scale has excellent reliability and construct validity and taps six established dimensions of satisfaction, including the art of care, technical quality, access, physical environment, availability, and efficacy. The multidimensional scale allows for alternative groupings of the domains of satisfaction as our understanding of prenatal care satisfaction increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10728256     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021841508698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  23 in total

1.  Prospective recruitment of women receiving prenatal care from diverse provider arrangements: a potential strategy.

Authors:  A Handler; D Rosenberg; T Johnson; K Raube; M A Kelley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

Review 2.  Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore.

Authors:  L Aharony; S Strasser
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

3.  Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters.

Authors:  J E Ware; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Can patients evaluate the quality of hospital care?

Authors:  H R Rubin
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1990

5.  Pregnant women's perceptions of prenatal care.

Authors:  M A Omar; R F Schiffman
Journal:  Matern Child Nurs J       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec

6.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder; W R Wright; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983

7.  Primary care arrangements and access to care among African-American women in three Chicago communities.

Authors:  M A Kelley; J D Perloff; N M Morris; W Liu
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1992

8.  Provider continuity and quality of medical care. A retrospective analysis of prenatal and perinatal outcome.

Authors:  C L Shear; B T Gipe; J K Mattheis; M R Levy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  C K Ross; C A Steward; J M Sinacore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.

Authors:  G R Alexander; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995
View more
  6 in total

1.  Health promotion and psychosocial services and women's assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Carol C Korenbrot; Sabrina T Wong; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

Review 2.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Predictors of prenatal care satisfaction among pregnant women in American Samoa.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi Adeyinka; Anne Marie Jukic; Stephen T McGarvey; Bethel T Muasau-Howard; Mata'uitafa Faiai; Nicola L Hawley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women?

Authors:  F Jafari; H Eftekhar; K Mohammad; A Fotouhi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries.

Authors:  Ana Langer; José Villar; Mariana Romero; Gustavo Nigenda; Gilda Piaggio; Chusri Kuchaisit; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimi; José Miguel Belizán; Ubaldo Farnot; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Alain Pinol; Per Bergsjö; Leiv Bakketeig; Jo Garcia; Heinz Berendes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Satisfaction with focused antenatal care service and associated factors among pregnant women attending focused antenatal care at health centers in Jimma town, Jimma zone, South West Ethiopia; a facility based cross-sectional study triangulated with qualitative study.

Authors:  Fantaye Chemir; Fessahaye Alemseged; Desta Workneh
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-03-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.