Literature DB >> 10725643

Image localization for frameless stereotactic radiotherapy.

S L Meeks1, F J Bova, T H Wagner, J M Buatti, W A Friedman, K D Foote.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Infrared light-emitting diodes (IRLEDs) have been used for optic-guided stereotactic radiotherapy localization at the University of Florida since 1995. The current paradigm requires stereotactic head ring placement for the patient's first fraction. The stereotactic coordinates and treatment plan are determined relative to this head ring. The IRLEDs are attached to the patient via a maxillary bite plate, and the position of the IRLEDs relative to linac isocenter is saved to file. These positions are then recalled for each subsequent treatment to position the patient for fractionated therapy. The purpose of this article was to report a method of predicting the desired IRLED locations without need for the invasive head ring. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To achieve the goal of frameless optic-guided radiotherapy, a method is required for direct localization of the IRLED positions from a CT scan. Because it is difficult to localize the exact point of light emission from a CT scan of an IRLED, a new bite plate was designed that contains eight aluminum fiducial markers along with the six IRLEDs. After a calibration procedure to establish the spatial relationship of the IRLEDs to the aluminum fiducial markers, the stereotactic coordinates of the IRLED light emission points are determined by localizing the aluminum fiducial markers in a stereotactic CT scan.
RESULTS: To test the accuracy of direct CT determination of the IRLED positions, phantom tests were performed. The average accuracy of isocenter localization using the IRLED bite plate was 0.65 +/- 0. 17 mm for these phantom tests. In addition, the optic-guided system has a unique compatibility with the stereotactic head ring. Therefore, the isocentric localization capability was clinically tested using the stereotactic head ring as the absolute standard. The ongoing clinical trial has shown the frameless system to provide a patient localization accuracy of 1.11 +/- 0.3 mm compared with the head ring.
CONCLUSION: Optic-guided radiotherapy using IRLEDs provides a mechanism through which setup accuracy may be improved over conventional techniques. To date, this optic-guided therapy has been used only as a hybrid system that requires use of the stereotactic head ring for the first fraction. This has limited its use in the routine clinical setting. Computation of the desired IRLED positions eliminates the need for the invasive head ring for the first fraction. This allows application of optic-guided therapy to a larger cohort of patients, and also facilitates the initiation of extracranial optic-guided radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10725643     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00536-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Clinical results of a pilot study on stereovision-guided stereotactic radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shidong Li; Lawrence R Kleinberg; Daniele Rigamonti; Moody D Wharam; Abdul Rashid; Juan Jackson; David Djajaputra; Shenjen He; Tunisia Creasey; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12

2.  Mitigating errors in external respiratory surrogate-based models of tumor position.

Authors:  Kathleen T Malinowski; Thomas J McAvoy; Rohini George; Sonja Dieterich; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiosurgery technology development and use.

Authors:  Sanford L Meeks; Jason Pukala; Naren Ramakrishna; Twyla R Willoughby; Francis J Bova
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

4.  The impact of tumor volume and radiotherapy dose on outcome in previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Dwight E Heron; Robert L Ferris; Regiane S Andrade; Michael K Gibson; Yong Yang; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Athanassios E Argiris; Jennifer R Grandis; Steven A Burton
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Dosimetric impact of intrafractional patient motion in pediatric brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; John Trussell; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 1.482

6.  A retrospective, deformable registration analysis of the impact of PET-CT planning on patterns of failure in stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kyle Wang; Dwight E Heron; John C Flickinger; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Robert L Ferris; Gregory J Kubicek; James P Ohr; Annette E Quinn; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Barton F Branstetter
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-04-19

7.  Evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of optical guided frameless system for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Jia-Zhu Wang; Roger Rice; Todd Pawlicki; Arno J Mundt; Ajay Sandhu; Joshua Lawson; Kevin T Murphy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A phantom study of the immobilization and the indications for using virtual isocenter in stereoscopic X-ray image guidance system referring to position localizer in frameless radiosurgery.

Authors:  Hsiao-Han Chang; Hsiao-Fei Lee; Chien-Cheng Sung; Tsung-I Liao; Yu-Jie Huang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Recent advances in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; Daniel R Simpson; Brent S Rose; Ajay P Sandhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Towards a noninvasive intracranial tumor irradiation using 3d optical imaging and multimodal data registration.

Authors:  R Posada; Ch Daul; D Wolf; P Aletti
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.