Literature DB >> 10720623

Predominant activation of I1-waves from the leg motor area by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Y Terao1, Y Ugawa, R Hanajima, K Machii, T Furubayashi, H Mochizuki, H Enomoto, Y Shiio, H Uesugi, N K Iwata, I Kanazawa.   

Abstract

We performed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elucidate the D- and I-wave components comprising the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from the leg motor area, especially at near-threshold intensity. Recordings were made from the tibialis anterior muscle using needle electrodes. A figure-of-eight coil was placed so as to induce current in the brain in eight different directions, starting from the posterior-to-anterior direction and rotating it in 45 degrees steps. The latencies were compared with those evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and TMS using a double cone coil. Although the latencies of MEPs ranged from D to I3 waves, the most prominent component evoked by TMS at near-threshold intensity represented the I1 wave. With the double cone coil, the elicited peaks always represented I1 waves, and D waves were evoked only at very high stimulus intensities, suggesting a high effectiveness of this coil in inducing I1 waves. Using the figure-of-eight coil, current flowing anteriorly or toward the hemisphere contralateral to the recorded muscle was more effective in eliciting large responses than current flowing posteriorly or toward the ipsilateral hemisphere. The effective directions induced I1 waves with the lowest threshold, whereas the less effective directions elicited I1 and I2 waves with a similar frequency. Higher stimulus intensities resulted in concomitant activation of D through I3 waves with increasing amount of D waves, but still the predominance of I1 waves was apparent. The amount of I waves, especially of I1 waves, was greater than predicted by the hypothesis that TMS over the leg motor area activates the output cells directly, but rather suggests predominant transsynaptic activation. The results accord with those of recent human epidural recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720623     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)01975-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  24 in total

1.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements.

Authors:  Maarten Steyvers; Seiji Etoh; Dieter Sauner; Oron Levin; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan P Swinnen; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neurophysiological examination of the corticospinal system and voluntary motor control in motor-incomplete human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W B McKay; D C Lee; H K Lim; S A Holmes; A M Sherwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the human hand motor area.

Authors:  Toshiaki Furubayashi; Yasuo Terao; Noritoshi Arai; Shingo Okabe; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Ritsuko Hanajima; Masashi Hamada; Akihiro Yugeta; Satomi Inomata-Terada; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reproducibility of TMS-Evoked EEG responses.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Dubravko Kicić; Petri Savolainen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The optimal interstimulus interval and repeatability of paired associative stimulation when the soleus muscle is targeted.

Authors:  Susanne Kumpulainen; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Jussi Peltonen; Michael Voigt; Janne Avela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Investing in the future: stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex reduces discounting of delayed rewards.

Authors:  Sang Soo Cho; Yuko Koshimori; Kelly Aminian; Ignacio Obeso; Pablo Rusjan; Anthony E Lang; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Sylvain Houle; Antonio P Strafella
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Descending spinal cord volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex leg area in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; M Meglio; B Cioni; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Deep continuous theta burst stimulation of the operculo-insular cortex selectively affects Aδ-fibre heat pain.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Maxime Algoet; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.