Literature DB >> 11744776

Descending spinal cord volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex leg area in conscious humans.

V Di Lazzaro1, A Oliviero, P Profice, M Meglio, B Cioni, P Tonali, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

1. Descending corticospinal volleys evoked after transcranial magnetic or electrical stimulation of the leg area of the motor cortex were recorded from an electrode in the spinal epidural space of six conscious patients who had electrodes implanted for treatment of chronic pain, and from one anaesthetised patient undergoing surgery for a spinal tumour. 2. At threshold, the shortest-latency volley (L1 volley) was evoked by stimulation with an anode 2 cm lateral to the vertex. Anodal stimulation at the vertex also elicited a volley at this latency in two patients, but in the other patients the first volley evoked appeared 1-1.3 ms later (L2 volley), at the same latency as the initial volley evoked by magnetic stimulation. High-intensity stimulation of any type could evoke both the L1 and L2 waves as well as later ones (L3, L4, etc.) that had a periodicity of about 1.5 ms. 3. Voluntary contraction increased the amplitude of the L2 and later volleys, but had no effect on the L1 volley. 4. Intracortical inhibition between pairs of magnetic stimuli resulted in clear suppression of the L4 and later waves. The L2 and L3 waves were unaffected. 5. In the anaesthetised patient the L1 volley occurred 1.7 ms later than the volley produced by transmastoid stimulation of the corticospinal pathways in the brainstem. 6. The L1 volley is likely to be a D wave produced by the direct activation of pyramidal axons in the subcortical white matter; the L2 and later volleys are likely to be I waves produced by the trans-synaptic activation of corticospinal neurones. The implication is that electrical stimulation with an anode at the vertex is more likely to evoke I waves preferentially than stimulation over the hand area. A more secure way to ensure D wave activation of corticospinal fibres from the leg area is to place the anode 2 cm lateral to the vertex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11744776      PMCID: PMC2279009          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.01047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  21 in total

1.  Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  D Burke; R G Hicks; J P Stephen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Percutaneous electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the level of the pyramidal decussation in humans.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation of the leg area of the human motor cortex: single motor unit and surface EMG responses in the tibialis anterior muscle.

Authors:  A Priori; L Bertolasi; D Dressler; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04

4.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  K J Werhahn; J K Fong; B U Meyer; A Priori; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-04

5.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

Authors:  B L Day; D Dressler; A Maertens de Noordhout; C D Marsden; K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation.

Authors:  J Rothwell; D Burke; R Hicks; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D Burke; R Hicks; S C Gandevia; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Task-related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on spinal neurones in man.

Authors:  J Nielsen; N Petersen; G Deuschl; M Ballegaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Latency of effects evoked by electrical and magnetic brain stimulation in lower limb motoneurones in man.

Authors:  J Nielsen; N Petersen; M Ballegaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  34 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of cortical motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Michael E Knash; Aiko Kido; Monica Gorassini; K Ming Chan; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Rapid changes in corticospinal excitability during force field adaptation of human walking.

Authors:  D Barthélemy; S Alain; M J Grey; J B Nielsen; L J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The optimal interstimulus interval and repeatability of paired associative stimulation when the soleus muscle is targeted.

Authors:  Susanne Kumpulainen; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Jussi Peltonen; Michael Voigt; Janne Avela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spinal and cortical activity-dependent plasticity following learning of complex arm movements in humans.

Authors:  T Winkler; B Mergner; J Szecsi; A Bender; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a neurophysiological marker of cortical hyperexcitability.

Authors:  Giovanni Pennisi; Raffaele Ferri; Giuseppe Lanza; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Manuela Pennisi; Valentina Puglisi; Giulia Malaguarnera; Rita Bella
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Interhemispheric plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhael Lomarev; Ejaz Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Heike Russman; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation on corticomuscular coherence in humans.

Authors:  Naja Liv Hansen; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Mechanisms controlling motor output to a transfer hand after learning a sequential pinch force skill with the opposite hand.

Authors:  Mickael Camus; Patrick Ragert; Yves Vandermeeren; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.