Literature DB >> 15616810

Neurophysiological examination of the corticospinal system and voluntary motor control in motor-incomplete human spinal cord injury.

W B McKay1, D C Lee, H K Lim, S A Holmes, A M Sherwood.   

Abstract

This study employed neurophysiological methods to relate the condition of the corticospinal system with the voluntary control of lower-limb muscles in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. It consisted of two phases. In a group of ten healthy subjects, single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex was used to study the behavior of the resulting motor evoked potentials (MEP) in lower-limb muscles. Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 15-100 ms were examined for augmentation of test MEPs by threshold or subthreshold conditioning stimuli. The second phase of this study examined eight incomplete spinal cord injured (iSCI) subjects, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale C (n = 5) and D (n = 3) in whom voluntary motor control was quantified using the surface EMG (sEMG) based Voluntary Response Index (VRI). The VRI is calculated to characterize relative output patterns across ten lower-limb muscles recorded during a standard protocol of elementary voluntary motor tasks. VRI components were calculated by comparing the distribution of sEMG in iSCI subjects with prototype patterns collected from 15 healthy subjects using the same rigidly administered protocol, The resulting similarity index (SI) and magnitude values provided the measure of voluntary motor control. Corticospinal system connections were characterized by the thresholds for MEPs in key muscles. Key muscles were those that function as the prime-movers, or agonists for the voluntary movements from which the VRI data were calculated. Results include healthy-subject data that showed significant increases in conditioned MEP responses with paired stimuli of 15-50 ms ISI. Stimulus pairs of 75 and 100 ms showed no increase in MEP peak amplitude over that of the single-pulse conditioning stimulus alone, usually no response. For the iSCI subjects, 42% of the agonists responded to single-pulse TMS and 25% required paired-pulse TMS to produce an MEP. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale component motor scores for agonist muscles, Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, and Triceps Surae, were significantly lower where MEPs could not be obtained (p < 0.05). VRI values were also significantly lower for motor tasks with agonists that had no resting MEP (p < 0.01). Therefore, the presence of a demonstrable connection between the motor cortex and spinal motor neurons in persons with SCI was related to the quality of post-injury voluntary motor control as assessed by the VRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15616810     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2190-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI.

Authors:  A M Sherwood; M R Dimitrijevic; W B McKay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Motor cortical dysfunction disclosed by single and double magnetic stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  A Salerno; E Thomas; P Olive; F Blotman; M C Picot; M Georgesco
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Intracortical inhibition of lower limb motor-evoked potentials after paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  D S Stokić; W B McKay; L Scott; A M Sherwood; M R Dimitrijević
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association.

Authors:  F M Maynard; M B Bracken; G Creasey; J F Ditunno; W H Donovan; T B Ducker; S L Garber; R J Marino; S L Stover; C H Tator; R L Waters; J E Wilberger; W Young
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans.

Authors:  K J Werhahn; E Kunesch; S Noachtar; R Benecke; J Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Electrical stimulation of the human descending motor tracts at several levels.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; K Genba-Shimizu; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Correlation of motor control in the supine position and assistive device used for ambulation in chronic incomplete spinal cord-injured persons.

Authors:  S F Tang; S M Tuel; W B McKay; M R Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Augmentation by 4-aminopyridine of vestibulospinal free fall responses in chronic spinal-injured cats.

Authors:  A R Blight; J A Gruner
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Modulation of transmission in the corticospinal and group Ia afferent pathways to soleus motoneurons during bicycling.

Authors:  H S Pyndt; J B Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans.

Authors:  Claudia A Angeli; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Profiling motor control in spinal cord injury: moving towards individualized therapy and evidence-based care progression.

Authors:  Keith E Tansey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Rachel H Cote; Janice M Sniffen; Jodi A Brangaccio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neurophysiological characterization of motor recovery in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W B McKay; A V Ovechkin; T W Vitaz; D G L Terson de Paleville; S J Harkema
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Properties of the surface electromyogram following traumatic spinal cord injury: a scoping review.

Authors:  Gustavo Balbinot; Guijin Li; Matheus Joner Wiest; Maureen Pakosh; Julio Cesar Furlan; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Jose Zariffa
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Quality of residual neuromuscular control and functional deficits in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Alexander V Ovechkin; Todd W Vitaz; Daniela G L Terson de Paleville; William B McKay
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Characterization of Spinal Sensorimotor Network Using Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation during Voluntary Movement Preparation and Performance.

Authors:  Alexander G Steele; Darryn A Atkinson; Blesson Varghese; Jeonghoon Oh; Rachel L Markley; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.