Literature DB >> 20554548

Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Lukasz Michalczyk1, Oliver Y Martin, Anna L Millard, Brent C Emerson, Matthew J G Gage.   

Abstract

As populations decline to levels where reproduction among close genetic relatives becomes more probable, subsequent increases in homozygous recessive deleterious expression and/or loss of heterozygote advantage can lead to inbreeding depression. Here, we measure how inbreeding across replicate lines of the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum impacts on male reproductive fitness in the absence or presence of male-male competition. Effects on male evolution from mating pattern were removed by enforcing monogamous mating throughout. After inbreeding across eight generations, we found that male fertility in the absence of competition was unaffected. However, we found significant inbreeding depression of sperm competitiveness: non-inbred males won 57 per cent of fertilizations in competition, while inbred equivalents only sired 42 per cent. We also found that the P(2) 'offence' role in sperm competition was significantly more depressed under inbreeding than sperm 'defence' (P(1)). Mating behaviour did not explain these differences, and there was no difference in the viability of offspring sired by inbred or non-inbred males. Sperm length variation was significantly greater in the ejaculates of inbred males. Our results show that male ability to achieve normal fertilization success was not depressed under strong inbreeding, but that inbreeding depression in these traits occurred when conditions of sperm competition were generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554548      PMCID: PMC2982220          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy.

Authors:  Oliver Y Martin; David J Hosken
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Polyandry facilitates postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in house mice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment.

Authors:  Helen S Crudgington; Sarah Fellows; Nichola S Badcock; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Francisco García-González
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Genetic diversity and reproductive success in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx).

Authors:  M Charpentier; J M Setchell; F Prugnolle; L A Knapp; E J Wickings; P Peignot; M Hossaert-McKey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Unique seminal quality in the South African cheetah and a comparative evaluation in the domestic cat.

Authors:  D E Wildt; M Bush; J G Howard; S J O'Brien; D Meltzer; A Van Dyk; H Ebedes; D J Brand
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Dating the genetic bottleneck of the African cheetah.

Authors:  M Menotti-Raymond; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

Authors:  S Meagher; D J Penn; W K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  17 in total

1.  The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Gabriela Gleiser; Sara Teixeira; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mating system affects population performance and extinction risk under environmental challenge.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna M Skrzynecka; Zofia M Prokop; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A father effect explains sex-ratio bias.

Authors:  Aurelio F Malo; Felipe Martinez-Pastor; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Julián Garde; Jonathan D Ballou; Robert C Lacy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sperm length variation as a predictor of extrapair paternity in passerine birds.

Authors:  Jan T Lifjeld; Terje Laskemoen; Oddmund Kleven; Tomas Albrecht; Raleigh J Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interactive effects of inbreeding and endocrine disruption on reproduction in a model laboratory fish.

Authors:  Lisa K Bickley; Andrew R Brown; David J Hosken; Patrick B Hamilton; Gareth Le Page; Gregory C Paull; Stewart F Owen; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Sperm quality but not relatedness predicts sperm competition success in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Marion Mehlis; Anna K Rahn; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Evidence for inbreeding depression and pre-copulatory, but not post copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the cabbage beetle Colaphellus bowringi.

Authors:  XingPing Liu; XiaoYun Tu; HaiMin He; Chao Chen; FangSen Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pattern of inbreeding depression, condition dependence, and additive genetic variance in Trinidadian guppy ejaculate traits.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Alessandro Devigili; Ryan Dosselli; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Coevolving parasites and population size shape the evolution of mating behaviour.

Authors:  Niels Ag Kerstes; Camillo Bérénos; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.