Literature DB >> 10712478

Local infusion of scopolamine into intraparietal cortex slows covert orienting in rhesus monkeys.

M C Davidson1, R T Marrocco.   

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence to suggest that cholinergic neurotransmission may play an important role in visuospatial attention, but the brain sites at which acetylcholine modulates attention are not well understood. The present work tested the hypothesis that the cholinergic influences within the intraparietal cortex are necessary for normal attentional shifting (covert orienting) in nonhuman primates. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to perform a visual, cued target detection task for liquid reinforcement. The animals pressed a lever to produce a visual display in which a central fixation point was flanked by two circles. Shortly after fixation was established, one of the circles brightened (cue), and a target appeared subsequently within one of the circles. Detection was signaled by a manual response and the reaction time to the appearance of the target was recorded. Four types of trials were presented. For valid cue trials, the cue and target were at the same spatial location; for invalid cues, cue and target were in opposite hemifields; for double cues, both cues were brightened but the target appeared in either the left or right circle; in no-cue trials, the cue was omitted. We localized the intraparietal region by recording attention-related, cellular activity with intracerebral microelectrodes. Among visually responsive cells in this area, valid cues presented to the receptive fields of visual neurons enhanced the responses to target stimuli in about half the cells and inhibited those responses in the remainder. In addition, some cells showed longer response latencies to invalid cues than to valid cues. We then infused scopolamine into attention-related activity sites and assessed its effect on performance. Scopolamine produced a dose-dependent increase in reaction times and decrease in performance accuracy that lasted more than 1 h. Neither vehicle injections in the same locations nor scopolamine outside the physiologically defined area produced any significant change in behavior. Under our conditions of measurement, we conclude that activity mediated by muscarinic cholinergic receptors within the intraparietal cortex is necessary for normal covert orienting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10712478     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

Review 1.  The role of neuromodulators in selective attention.

Authors:  Behrad Noudoost; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

Review 3.  Normal genetic variation, cognition, and aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Orienting and alerting: effect of 24 h of prolonged wakefulness.

Authors:  Maria Casagrande; Diana Martella; Enrico Di Pace; Fabio Pirri; Francesco Guadalupi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Specificity of the effect of a nicotinic receptor polymorphism on individual differences in visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; John A Fossella; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dynamic gain changes during attentional modulation.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  The time course of alerting effect over orienting in the attention network test.

Authors:  Luis J Fuentes; Guillermo Campoy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components of attention.

Authors:  Robert L Matchock; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.