Literature DB >> 10711835

Oral alkylating agents for breast cancer therapy.

J A O'Shaughnessy1.   

Abstract

Oral cyclophosphamide is well tolerated and effective. Published data support its use as part of adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer treatment regimens. Cyclophosphamide has generally been administered at a higher dose intensity when given orally compared with intravenous infusion. However, there is currently no evidence that oral cyclophosphamide is either more toxic or more or less effective than an equivalent dose of intravenous cyclophosphamide. There is evidence in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings that classical oral cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil (CMF) is more effective than intravenous CMF, possibly because of the greater dose intensity of classical CMF. Prolonged administration of oral cyclophosphamide up to high cumulative doses is associated with an elevated risk of a secondary leukaemia. The rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhoea with oral cyclophosphamide are directly related to the total dose of cyclophosphamide administered and the patient's age. With the growing availability of other oral cytotoxic agents with demonstrated effectiveness in breast cancer, it is likely that oral cyclophosphamide will be incorporated once again into regimens for both metastatic and adjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10711835     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199958003-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  24 in total

Review 1.  Evolving concepts in the systemic adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  G Bonadonna
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The magnitude of endocrine effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal breast cancer patients. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Castiglione
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  The Charing Cross Hospital experience with temozolomide in patients with gliomas.

Authors:  E S Newlands; S M O'Reilly; M G Glaser; M Bower; H Evans; C Brock; M H Brampton; I Colquhoun; P Lewis; J M Rice-Edwards; R D Illingworth; P G Richards
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  DNA damage and repair in mouse leukemia L1210 cells treated with nitrogen mustard, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea, and other nitrosoureas.

Authors:  R A Ewig; K W Kohn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Adjuvant CMFVP versus melphalan for operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes: 10-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  S E Rivkin; S Green; B Metch; H Glucksberg; N Gad-el-Mawla; J J Constanzi; B Hoogstraten; J Athens; T Maloney; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15.

Authors:  B Fisher; A M Brown; N V Dimitrov; R Poisson; C Redmond; R G Margolese; D Bowman; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; C G Kardinal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Improving fluorouracil chemotherapy with novel orally administered fluoropyrimidines.

Authors:  R B Diasio
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Ten-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) clinical trial evaluating the use of L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; E R Fisher; C Redmond
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Combination of idarubicin and cyclophosphamide administered orally in untreated postmenopausal breast cancer patients. A phase II study.

Authors:  K Kolarić; Z Mechl
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856).

Authors:  E S Newlands; G R Blackledge; J A Slack; G J Rustin; D B Smith; N S Stuart; C P Quarterman; R Hoffman; M F Stevens; M H Brampton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Stephen T Keir; John M Maris; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Jianrong Wu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Randomized trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with celecoxib for recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Mihaela Cristea; Paul Frankel; Christopher Ruel; Chen Chen; Yingyu Wang; Robert Morgan; Lucille Leong; Warren Chow; Marianna Koczywas; Steve Koehler; Dean Lim; Thehang Luu; Cynthia Martel; Mark McNamara; George Somlo; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Yun Yen; Amanam Idorenyi; Tinsley Raechelle; Mary Carroll; Vincent Chung
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  Temozolomide Enhances Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Virotherapy In Vitro.

Authors:  Rodolfo Garza-Morales; Roxana Gonzalez-Ramos; Akiko Chiba; Roberto Montes de Oca-Luna; Lacey R McNally; Kelly M McMasters; Jorge G Gomez-Gutierrez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.