Literature DB >> 2202791

Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15.

B Fisher1, A M Brown, N V Dimitrov, R Poisson, C Redmond, R G Margolese, D Bowman, N Wolmark, D L Wickerham, C G Kardinal.   

Abstract

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) implemented protocol B-15 to compare 2 months of Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) and cyclophosphamide (AC) with 6 months of conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with breast cancer nonresponsive to tamoxifen (TAM, T). A second aim was to determine whether AC followed in 6 months by intravenous (IV) CMF was more effective than AC without reinduction therapy. Through 3 years of follow-up, findings from 2,194 patients indicate no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS, P = .5), distant disease-free survival (DDFS, P = .5) or survival (S, P = .8) among the three groups. Since the outcome from AC and CMF was almost identical, the issue arises concerning which regimen is more appropriate for the treatment of breast cancer patients. AC seems preferable since, following total mastectomy, AC was completed on day 63 versus day 154 for conventional CMF; patients visited health professionals three times as often for conventional CMF as for AC; women on AC received therapy on each of 4 days versus on each of 84 days for conventional CMF; and nausea-control medication was given for about 84 days to conventional CMF patients versus for about 12 days to patients on AC. The difference in the amount of alopecia between the two treatment groups was less than anticipated. While alopecia was almost universally observed following AC therapy, 71% of the CMF patients also had hair loss and, in 41%, the loss was greater than 50%. This study and NSABP B-16, which evaluates the worth of AC therapy in TAM-responsive patients, indicate the merit of 2 months of AC therapy for all positive-node breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2202791     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.9.1483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  102 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: emerging evidence to aid in decision making.

Authors:  Gretchen Kimmick
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  Breast cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  S Samuel Kim; Jennifer Klemp; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Duration of chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: have we reached the limit? What is the survival impact of amenorrhea?

Authors:  Rebecca L Hirsh; Kevin R Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2010-12

4.  Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michael F Press; Guido Sauter; Marc Buyse; Leslie Bernstein; Roberta Guzman; Angela Santiago; Ivonne E Villalobos; Wolfgang Eiermann; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Nicholas Robert; John Crown; Valerie Bee; Henry Taupin; Kerry J Flom; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Giovanni Pauletti; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Monica Fornier; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  The German SUCCESS C Study - The First European Lifestyle Study on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brigitte Rack; Ulrich Andergassen; Julia Neugebauer; Jessica Salmen; Philip Hepp; Harald Sommer; Werner Lichtenegger; Klaus Friese; Matthias W Beckmann; Dagmar Hauner; Hans Hauner; Wolfgang Janni
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Anthracycline Use for Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: a Review.

Authors:  Sakshi Jasra; Jesus Anampa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-11

8.  Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and Fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel versus Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Margot Burnell; Mark N Levine; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Vivien Bramwell; Karen Gelmon; Barbara Walley; Ted Vandenberg; Haji Chalchal; Kathy S Albain; Edith A Perez; Hope Rugo; Kathleen Pritchard; Patti O'Brien; Lois E Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Aortic stiffness increases upon receipt of anthracycline chemotherapy.

Authors:  Narumol Chaosuwannakit; Ralph D'Agostino; Craig A Hamilton; Kimberly S Lane; William O Ntim; Julia Lawrence; Susan A Melin; Leslie R Ellis; Frank M Torti; William C Little; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance).

Authors:  Lawrence N Shulman; Donald A Berry; Constance T Cirrincione; Heather P Becker; Edith A Perez; Ruth O'Regan; Silvana Martino; Charles L Shapiro; Charles J Schneider; Gretchen Kimmick; Harold J Burstein; Larry Norton; Hyman Muss; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.