BACKGROUND: The DNA methylating agent temozolomide was developed primarily for treatment of glioblastoma. However, preclinical data have suggested a broader application for treatment of childhood cancer. Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP solid tumor and ALL models. PROCEDURES: Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1,000 µM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at doses from 22 to 100 mg/kg administered orally daily for 5 days, repeated at day 21. RESULTS: In vitro temozolomide showed cytotoxicity with a median relative IC50 (rIC50 ) value of 380 µM against the PPTP cell lines (range 1 to > 1,000 µM). The three lines with rIC50 values lesser than 10 µM had low MGMT expression compared to the remaining cell lines. In vivo temozolomide demonstrated significant toxicity at 100 mg/kg, but induced tumor regressions in 15 of 23 evaluable solid tumor models (13 maintained CR [MCR], 2 CR) and 5 of 8 ALL models (3 MCR, 2 CR). There was a steep dose response curve, with lower activity at 66 mg/kg temozolomide and with tumor regressions at 22 and 44 mg/kg restricted to models with low MGMT expression. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide demonstrated high level antitumor activity against both solid tumor and leukemia models, but also elicited significant toxicity at the highest dose level. Lowering the dose of TMZ to more closely match clinical exposures markedly reduced the antitumor activity for many xenograft lines with responsiveness at lower doses closely related to low MGMT expression.
BACKGROUND: The DNA methylating agent temozolomide was developed primarily for treatment of glioblastoma. However, preclinical data have suggested a broader application for treatment of childhood cancer. Temozolomide was tested against the PPTPsolid tumor and ALL models. PROCEDURES: Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1,000 µM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at doses from 22 to 100 mg/kg administered orally daily for 5 days, repeated at day 21. RESULTS: In vitro temozolomide showed cytotoxicity with a median relative IC50 (rIC50 ) value of 380 µM against the PPTP cell lines (range 1 to > 1,000 µM). The three lines with rIC50 values lesser than 10 µM had low MGMT expression compared to the remaining cell lines. In vivo temozolomide demonstrated significant toxicity at 100 mg/kg, but induced tumor regressions in 15 of 23 evaluable solid tumor models (13 maintained CR [MCR], 2 CR) and 5 of 8 ALL models (3 MCR, 2 CR). There was a steep dose response curve, with lower activity at 66 mg/kg temozolomide and with tumor regressions at 22 and 44 mg/kg restricted to models with low MGMT expression. CONCLUSIONS:Temozolomide demonstrated high level antitumor activity against both solid tumor and leukemia models, but also elicited significant toxicity at the highest dose level. Lowering the dose of TMZ to more closely match clinical exposures markedly reduced the antitumor activity for many xenograft lines with responsiveness at lower doses closely related to low MGMT expression.
Authors: M R Middleton; J Kelly; N Thatcher; D J Donnelly; R S McElhinney; T B McMurry; J E McCormick; G P Margison Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: D S Middlemas; C F Stewart; M N Kirstein; C Poquette; H S Friedman; P J Houghton; T P Brent Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P J Houghton; C F Stewart; P J Cheshire; L B Richmond; M N Kirstein; C A Poquette; M Tan; H S Friedman; T P Brent Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: L A Hammond; J R Eckardt; S D Baker; S G Eckhardt; M Dugan; K Forral; P Reidenberg; P Statkevich; G R Weiss; D A Rinaldi; D D Von Hoff; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Brada; I Judson; P Beale; S Moore; P Reidenberg; P Statkevich; M Dugan; V Batra; D Cutler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Brendan Murphy; Han Yin; John M Maris; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; Stephen T Keir; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Igor Dvorchik; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Nana Boateng; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock; Peter J Houghton Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Malcolm A Smith; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; Hernan Carol; Richard B Lock; Stephen T Keir; John M Maris; Catherine A Billups; Dmitry Lyalin; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yvonne A Evrard; Anuj Srivastava; Jelena Randjelovic; James H Doroshow; Dennis A Dean; Jeffrey S Morris; Jeffrey H Chuang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Murakami; Kei Kawaguchi; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kentaro Miyake; Yong Zhang; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Yunfeng Li; Jane Yanagawa; Tara A Russell; Arun S Singh; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Irmina Elliott; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-07-08
Authors: Kentaro Igarashi; Kei Kawaguchi; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kentaro Miyake; Masuyo Miyake; Yunfeng Li; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Arun S Singh; Irmina A Elliott; Tara A Russell; Mark A Eckardt; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Hiroaki Kimura; Shinji Miwa; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Fritz C Eilber; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-12-04