Literature DB >> 3519883

Ten-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) clinical trial evaluating the use of L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer.

B Fisher, E R Fisher, C Redmond.   

Abstract

Between 1972 and 1974, patients were entered into a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial to evaluate L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) as an adjuvant to mastectomy in patients with primary breast cancer and pathologically positive axillary nodes. Overall, findings through 10 years of observation indicate an 8% difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .06) and a 5% difference in survival (P = .4). Women less than or equal to 49 years of age who received L-PAM demonstrate a significant (P = .03) prolongation of DFS and a significant (P = .05) survival benefit compared with those who received a placebo. There is a 37% reduction in their mortality and a cumulative odds of survival of 1.67. In that age group, both those with one to three and greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes benefited, but the advantage was greater when there were fewer positive nodes. There was a significant (P = .009) reduction in mortality (64%) and a cumulative odds of survival of 3.25 in patients less than or equal to 49 years old with one to three positive nodes. No advantage from L-PAM was observed in patients greater than or equal to 50 years old. When L-PAM response is related to nuclear grade, a marker of tumor differentiation, there is a highly significant improvement in DFS (less than .001), distant DFS (.001), and survival (.004) through 10 years of observation for all patients with tumors classified as nuclear grade poor (poorly differentiated), regardless of age and nodal status. Mortality was reduced by 32% and the cumulative odds of survival was 2.10 at 10 years. Of singular importance is the observation of a benefit in those greater than or equal to 50 years of age as well as in those less than or equal to 49 years of age with poorly differentiated tumors. There is a significant (P = .003) survival benefit for those in the older age group with a 37% reduction in mortality, and a cumulative odds of survival of 2.75. Patients in both age groups with well-differentiated tumors demonstrated no benefit from L-PAM. Those who are older seem to do less well following chemotherapy. We conclude that tumor differentiation is a better discriminant of response to chemotherapy than is age, and that both younger and older women are responsive to adjuvant chemotherapy when they have poorly differentiated tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3519883     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.6.929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Has adjuvant treatment of breast cancer had an unfair trial?

Authors:  I Mittra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-08

2.  Prognostic factors in node-positive operable breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  E Rakowsky; B Klein; E Kahan; E Derazne; H Lurie
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  NSABP trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A further look at the evidence.

Authors:  C B Mueller; M L Lesperance
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Relationship of estrogen and progesterone receptors to prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  G A Gelbfish; A L Davidson; S Kopel; B Schreibman; J S Gelbfish; G A Degenshein; B L Herz; J N Cunningham
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Time-Varying Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Hanna Bandos; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; William F Anderson; Edward H Romond; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  P I Borgen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A high-throughput pharmaceutical screen identifies compounds with specific toxicity against BRCA2-deficient tumors.

Authors:  Bastiaan Evers; Eva Schut; Eline van der Burg; Tanya M Braumuller; David A Egan; Henne Holstege; Pauline Edser; David J Adams; Richard Wade-Martins; Peter Bouwman; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Tumor nuclear grade, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor: their value alone or in combination as indicators of outcome following adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; E R Fisher; C Redmond; A Brown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Response to treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Berenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.